• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Suppressive Person Defense League

  • About SPDL
    • Legal and Disclaimer
  • Key documents: Suppressive Person Doctrine
  • Extremist Material
  • Fair Game Evidence
  • Writings
  • Glossary

April 7, 1964 by clerk Leave a Comment

HCOB: All Levels Q and A

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 APRIL 19641

CenOCon

ALL LEVELS

Q AND A

A great number of auditors Q and A.

This is because they have not understood what it is.

Nearly all their auditing failures stem not from using wrong processes but from Q and A.

Accordingly I have looked the matter over and re-defined Q and A.

The origin of the term comes from “changing when the pc changes”. The basic answer to a question is, obviously, a question if one follows the duplication of the comm formula completely. See Philadelphia Congress 1953 tapes where this was covered very fully. A later definition was “Questioning the pc’s Answer”. Another effort to overcome it and explain Q and A was the Anti-Q and A drill. But none of these reached home.

The new definition is this:

Q AND A IS A FAILURE TO COMPLETE A CYCLE OF ACTION ON A PRECLEAR.

A CYCLE OF ACTION IS REDEFINED AS START—CONTINUE—COMPLETE.

Thus an auditing comm cycle is a cycle of action. It starts with the auditor asking a question the preclear can understand, getting the preclear to answer it and acknowledging that answer.

A process cycle is selecting a process to be run on the preclear, running the tone arm action into it (if necessary) and running the tone arm action out of it.

A program cycle is selecting an action to be performed, performing that action and completing it.

Thus you can see that an auditor who interrupts or changes an auditing comm cycle before it is complete is “Q and A-ing”. This could be done by violating or preventing or not doing any part of the auditing cycle, i.e., ask the pc a question, get an answer to a different idea, ask the different idea, thus abandoning the original question.

An auditor who starts a process, just gets it going, gets a new idea because of pc cognition, takes up the cognition and abandons the original process is Q and A-ing.

A program such as “prepcheck this pc’s family” is begun, and for any reason left incomplete to go chasing some new idea to prepcheck, is a Q and A.

Unfinished cycles of action are all that louse up cases.

Since time is a continuum, a failure to carry out a cycle of action (a continuum) hangs the pc up  at that exact point.

If you don’t believe it, prepcheck “Incomplete actions” on a pc! What Incomplete action has been suppressed? etc, cleaning the meter for real on every button. And you’d have a clear—or a pc that would behave that way on a meter.

_________

Understand this and you’ll be about ninety times as effective as an auditor.

“Don’t Q-and-A!” means “Don’t leave cycles of action incomplete on a pc.”

The gains you hope to achieve on a pc are lost when you Q-and-A.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Hubbard, L. R. (1964, 7 April). Q and A. Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Vol. V. pp. 395-396). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes

  1. Document studied on the Hubbard Senior Security Checker Course. ↩

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: HSSC, Interrogation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Scientology's "Suppressive Person" mask

Transcript: The SP Doctrine on Trial

Footer

Recent Posts

  • Twelve Characteristics, Eleven GO Felons (2019)
  • Speaking up for SPs to David Miscavige (2019)
  • SPDL: Speaking up for SPs (2019)
  • News: Scientology Cult Shut Down Over Shady Land-Grabbing Black Ops in Moscow
  • Book: Dianetics The Modern Science Of Mental Health: Chapter 1 (excerpt)

Tags

black propaganda chaos merchant criminals David Miscavige dead agent enemy Ethics evil purposes Fair game FDA FPRD Gerry Armstrong Glossary GO Intelligence Course government HFPRDA How to Confront and Shatter Suppression PTS/SP Course HSSC illness intelligence Interrogation L. Ron Hubbard legal Mary Sue Hubbard NCG OSA overts overts and withholds personnel requirements PR psychiatrists psychiatry psychosis PTS Rehabilitation Project Force rock slammers roller coaster RPF Russia scapegoating Scientology security Sea Org security checks SP Doctrine Suppressive Person

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro (Edited on 1 June 2017) on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in