• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Suppressive Person Defense League

  • About SPDL
    • Legal and Disclaimer
  • Key documents: Suppressive Person Doctrine
  • Extremist Material
  • Fair Game Evidence
  • Writings
  • Glossary

November 23, 1980 by clerk Leave a Comment

HCOB: Case Supervisor Confessional

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 19801

Remimeo
HCO
Tech/Qual

Confessional Form 8RA

CASE SUPERVISOR CONFESSIONAL

Ref:
HCOB 30 Nov. 78 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE

Anyone doing a Confessional must have done or be on a Confessional course or internship.

The procedure for doing a Confessional is contained in HCOB 30 Nov. 78, CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE.

When applying Confessional tech correctly, you are helping the individual to face up to his responsibilities in his group and the society and putting him back into communication with his fellow man, his family and the world at large.

AUDITOR:_______________   PRECLEAR:_______________
ORG:_______________   DATE:____________________

1. HAVE YOU EVER EVALUATED THE MEANING OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS FOR AN AUDITOR? ________

2. HAVE YOU EVER TOLD AN AUDITOR HOW HE SHOULD AUDIT? ________

3. HAVE YOU EVER PRETENDED TO QUOTE HCOBs OR PLs WITHOUT SHOWING THE ACTUAL ISSUE? ________

4. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO REFER AN AUDITOR TO AN HCOB, BOOK OR TAPE? ________

5. HAVE YOU ALTERED THE CONTENT OF AN HCOB OR PL IN ANY WAY? ________

6. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed FOR A PROCESS WHICH YOU’D SEEN BUT WAS NEVER PUBLISHED? ________

7. HAVE YOU EVER ACCEPTED VERBAL TECH FROM ANYONE? ________

8. HAVE YOU EVER MISUSED OR ALTERED TECH? ________

9. HAVE YOU GIVEN OUT INSTRUCTIONS TO AN AUDITOR THAT WERE CONTRARY TO HCOBs OR PLs? ________

10. HAVE YOU TOLERATED OUT-ADMIN IN PC FOLDERS?  ________

11. HAVE YOU EVER OKAYED AN AUDITOR’S C/S WHEN YOU REALLY COULDN’T TELL WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST SESSION? ________

12. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A CASE WHEN THE FOLDER SUMMARY WAS CONFUSING OR OUT-OF-DATE? ________

13. HAVE YOU EVER GONE ON C/Sing A CASE WHEN AN FES SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE? ________

14. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO GET FAMILIAR WITH A CASE BEFORE C/Sing IT? ________

15. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A FOLDER FROM JUST A GLIB STUDY OF THE LAST SESSION’S ADMIN? ________

16. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN UP TRYING TO CORRECT AN AUDITOR’S HANDWRITING? ________

17. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A CASE WITHOUT EXAM REPORTS? ________

18. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO SEE THAT PC PROGRAMS WERE ACTUALLY COMPLETED? ________

19. HAVE YOU EVER ALLOWED A PC TO BE AUDITED WITHOUT THE FOLDER BEING C/Sed? ________

20. HAVE YOU EVER JUST PATCHED UP A PC AND THEN DROPPED HIM? ________

21. HAVE YOU PERMITTED A FREQUENT CHANGE OF AUDITORS ON A CASE? ________

22. HAVE YOU EVER LET RED TAGS REMAIN UNHANDLED FOR MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS? ________

23. HAVE YOU C/Sed A RED-TAGGED SESSION WITHOUT FIRST FINDING OUT WHAT REALLY WENT WRONG? ________

24. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed AN ILL PC WITHOUT FINDING AND HANDLING THE TECH REASON? ________

25. HAVE YOU EVER NOT HANDLED MIS-C/Sing OR MISAUDITING ON A CASE? ________

26. HAVE YOU EVER NEGLECTED THE CASES OF EXECS? ________

27. HAVE YOU EVER LET STAFF CASES GO UNHANDLED?  ________

28. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO SEND AN AUDIIOR TO CRAMMING WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE? ________

29. AS A C/S, HAVE YOU EVER NEGLECTED TO HANDLE AUDITORS YOU WERE C/Sing FOR WHO HAD OUT TRs OR OUT-METERING? ________

30. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN A WELL DONE TO AN AUDITOR WHEN THE SESSION REALLY WASN’T? ________

31. HAVE YOU NOT STUDIED YOUR C/S HAT? ________

32. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed WHILE YOUR HIGH-CRIME CHECKOUTS WERE BACKLOGGED? ________

33. HAVE YOU BEEN SPENDING C/Sing TIME DOING SOMETHING ELSE? ________

34. HAVE YOU EVER BACKLOGGED OR REFUSED TO DO CRAMMING ORDERS THAT HAD BEEN WRITTEN ON YOU? ________

35. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO INSIST THAT AUDITORS YOU WERE C/Sing FOR KEPT UP THEIR HIGHCRIME CHECKOUTS? ________

36. HAVE YOU NEGLECTED TO KEEP UP INSPECTIONS OF THE TECH AND QUAL LINES PER C/S SERIES 57? ________

37. HAVE YOU EVER PUSHED QUALITY AND NEGLECTED QUANTITY? ________

38. HAVE YOU EVER PUSHED QUANTITY AND NEGLECTED QUALITY? ________

39. IS THERE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTION YOU ARE AFRAID TO ASK FOR FEAR IT WOULD MAKE YOU LOOK INCOMPETENT OR STUPID? ________

40. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed OVER TECH MISUNDERSTOODS? ________

41. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO GET GOOD RESULTS ON A CASE? ________

42. HAVE YOU EVER CONTINUED TO C/S A CASE THAT BAFFLED YOU WITHOUT SEEKING HELP FROM A SENIOR TECH TERMINAL? ________

43. HAVE YOU EVER “GONE ON HOPING” WHILE C/Sing A CASE? ________

44. HAVE YOU EVER SENT A PC TO ETHICS WHEN THE REAL CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE WAS OUT-TECH? ________

45. HAVE YOU EVER Q-AND-Aed WITH A PC WHEN C/Sing?  ________

46. HAVE YOU EVER Q-AND-Aed WITH AN AUDITOR WHEN C/Sing? ________

47. AS A C/S, HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO HOLD YOUR POSITION ON SOMETHING? ________

48. HAVE YOU EVER BECOME INVOLVED 2D-WISE WITH A PC YOU WERE C/Sing? ________

49. HAVE YOU EVER LET A SENIOR EXEC TELL YOU HOW TO PROGRAM A PC? ________

50. HAVE YOU EVER LET A REGISTRAR TELL YOU HOW TO PROGRAM A PC? ________

51. HAVE YOU EVER LET PERSONAL OPINION SWAY YOU IN C/Sing A PC’S CASE? ________

52. HAVE YOU EVER TALKED WITH A PC AND THEN C/Sed HIS CASE FROM THAT TALK? ________

53. HAVE YOU EVER AGREED WITH AN AUDITOR THAT THE PC WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SESSION GOING WRONG? ________

54. HAVE YOU EVER WRITTEN A C/S BASED ON SOME IDEA OR OPINION INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING THE C/S SERIES? ________

55. HAVE YOU EVER NOT WRITTEN A CRAMMING ORDER WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE? ________

56. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO USE ETHICS OR JUSTICE ON SOMEONE THAT WAS BEING SOMEONE THAT WAS BEING HARMFUL OR DESTRUCTIVE ON TECH OR QUAL LINES? ________

57. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO USE ETHICS ON AN AUDITOR WHEN IT WAS NEEDED? ________

58. HAVE YOU EVER NOT HANDLED AN EXAMINER WHO FALSELY REPORTED? ________

59. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO USE ETHICS ON A PC WHEN IT WAS NEEDED? ________

60. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO TAKE ACTION WHEN JUSTICE WAS MISAPPLIED ON AN AUDITOR OR OTHER TECH PERSONNEL? ________

61. HAVE YOU ACCEPTED ANY ILLEGAL PC FOR PROCESSING? ________

62. HAVE YOU EVER INCORRECTLY LABELED A PC “ILLEGAL”? ________

63. HAVE YOU EVER USED THE SNR C/S TO FRONT FOR YOU? ________

64. HAVE YOU EVER COVERED UP ERRORS IN YOUR C/Sing? ________

65. HAVE YOU EVER BLAMED YOUR ERRORS ON ANOTHER C/S OR AUDITOR? ________

66. HAVE YOU EVER BLAMED A PC? ________

67. HAVE YOU EVER MADE A C/S WRONG? ________

68. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed BADLY? ________

69. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS OF OMISSION ON A SNR C/S? ________

70. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS OF COMMISSION ON A SNR C/S? ________

71. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS OF OMISSION ON LRH? ________

72. DO YOU HAVE OVERTS OF COMMISSION ON LRH? ________

73. HAVE YOU EVER NOT BOTHERED TO SEE THAT AUDITORS WERE PROPERLY TRAINED? ________

74. AS A C/S, HAVE YOU EVER NEGLECTED TO ENSURE THE AUDITORS UNDER YOU WERE IN GOOD CASE SHAPE? ________

75. HAVE YOU EVER CONDONED OR BEEN INVOLVED IN A TTC RIP-OFF? ________

76. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO HELP ESTABLISH A TTC?  ________

77. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED AN AUDITOR’S INTENTIONS? ________

78. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED AN AUDITOR’S FUTURE? ________

79. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED AN AUDITOR’S POTENTIAL? ________

80. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED OR HARASSED AN AUDITOR WHEN NO TECHNICAL GOOF H AD OCCURRED? ________

81. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED OR HARASSED AN AUDITOR FOR DOING A CORRECT ACTION? ________

82. HAVE YOU FAILED TO RECOGNIZE AND ACKNOWLEDGE A TECHNICALLY PERFECT SESSION?  ________

83. HAVE YOU EVER INVALIDATED AN AUDITOR’S WILLINGNESS TO AUDIT? ________

84. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO STRENGTHEN AN AUDITOR’S WILLINGNESS TO AUDIT? ________

85. HAVE YOU EVER LET AN AUDITOR GIVE UP AUDITING AND NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT? ________

86. HAVE YOU EVER SNOOPED THROUGH A PC FOLDER FOR PERSONAL INTERESTS? ________

87. HAVE YOU EVER HAD A PC GET EXTRA EXAMS JUST TO GET AN F/N AFTER SESSION? ________

88. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed WHILE NOT HAVING READ THE BASIC BOOKS OR C/S SERIES? ________

89. HAVE YOU EVER RUN A PROCESS YOU WEREN’T QUALIFIED TO RUN? ________

90. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed FOR AN AUDITOR TO RUN A PROCESS THAT WAS ABOVE HIS TRAINING LEVEL? ________

91. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed SOLO FOLDERS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO? ________

92. HAVE YOU EVER DELIVERED PROCESSES WHICH WERE UNAUTHORIZED FOR THE ORG YOU WERE AT?  ________

93. HAVE YOU EVER DONE ILLEGAL SOLO SESSIONS ON YOURSELF? ________

94. HAVE YOU EVER READ YOUR OWN CASE FOLDER? ________

95. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed YOUR OWN CASE? ________

96. HAVE YOU EVER GUESSED AT OR FALSELY REPORTED THE F/N VGI PERCENTAGE? ________

97. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed FOR AN ACTION AND THEN, AFTER THE FOLDER WAS SENT TO THE AUDITOR, HAD DOUBTS IF IT WAS THE CORRECT ACTION? ________

98. HAVE YOU EVER SENT A PC TO DECLARE WHEN YOU KNEW OR HAD DOUBTS IF HE’D MADE IT? ________

99. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A PC FOR HIGHER GRADES HOPING THAT WOULD HANDLE THE PC? ________

100. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A PC TO ATTEST TO A GRADE WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF THE FULL ABILITY GAINED HAVING BEEN ACHIEVED? ________

101. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed FOR A MULTIPLE DECLARE? ________

102. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A PC TO DECLARE OR ATTEST TO STATES BEING ASSERTED JUST TO AVOID UPSETTING THE PC? ________

103. HAVE YOU C/Sed A PC TO ATTEST TO PROCESSES OR A GRADE RUN IN A FORMER LIFE ALTHOUGH THE PC COULD NOT RECALL THE PROCESSES AND NO RELEASE POINT COULD BE FOUND? ________

104. HAVE YOU EVER LET A PC ATTEST TO CLEAR WHEN HE HADN’T MADE IT? ________

105. HAVE YOU EVER WRITTEN A C/S TO “2WC A PROCESS TO EP”? ________

106. HAVE YOU EVER LET AN AUDITOR GET AN F/N BY 2WC OR DISCUSSION OF A LEVEL OR PROCESS AND CALL THAT THE EP? ________

107. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A PC TO DECLARE OR ATTEST TO STATES BEING ASSERTED BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T KNOW WHAT ELSE TO DO? ________

108. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed A PC TO ATTEST TO STATES BEING ASSERTED BECAUSE YOU FELT YOU HAD TO “VALIDATE THE PC”? ________

109. AS A PC, HAVE YOU FALSELY ATTESTED TO GRADES, LEVELS OR STATES? ________

110. HAVE YOU EVER OVERESTIMATED A PC’S TRUE CASE LEVEL? ________

111. HAVE YOU EVER UNDERESTIMATED A PC’S TRUE CASE LEVEL? ________

112. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO SEE THAT A PC FULLY UNDERSTOOD THE AUDITING PROCEDURE? ________

113. HAVE YOU EVER C/Sed FOR MAJOR ACTIONS TO REPAIR A CASE? ________

114. HAVE YOU EVER ILLEGALLY AUDITED PCs OUTSIDE AN ORG? ________

115. HAVE YOU EVER ILLEGALLY C/Sed CASE FOLDERS OUTSIDE AN ORG? ________

116. HAVE YOU EVER BROKEN YOUR CONTRACT WITH AN ORG? ________

117. HAVE YOU EVER DISCLOSED CLASS VIII COURSE DATA? ________

118. HAVE YOU EVER DISCLOSED DATA FROM A CONFIDENTIAL PROCESS? ________

119. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN INSECURE WITH CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS? ________

120. HAVE YOU EVER XEROXED OR COPIED CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS? ________

121. HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO C/S A CASE? ________

122. HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO C/S FOR AN AUDITOR?  ________

123. HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO C/S FOR AN ORG? ________

124. HAVE YOU EVER THREATENED TO QUIT YOUR POST AS C/S? ________

125. HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED GIVING UP C/Sing? ________

126. HAVE YOU EVER LEFT A TECH POST TO ESCAPE FROM SOMETHING? ________

127. HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED LEAVING A TECH POST TO ESCAPE FROM SOMETHING? ________

128. HAVE YOU EVER ADVISED SOMEONE AGAINST GETTING AUDITING AT SOME ORG? ________

129. AS A C/S, HAVE YOU EVER FALSELY OR INACCURATELY REPRESENTED ANYTHING? ________

130. REGARDING YOUR C/Sing, IS THERE ANYTHING WHICH SHOULDN’T BE KNOWN? ________

131. IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THE AUDITORS YOU C/S FOR WHICH SHOULD NOT BE KNOWN? ________

132. IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THE TECH DELIVERY AT AN ORG OR MISSION WHERE YOU’VE C/Sed WHICH SHOULDN’T BE KNOWN? ________

133. HAVE YOU COMMITTED A TECH OVERT NOT COVERED IN THESE QUESTIONS? ________

134. IS THERE ANY QUESTION ABOUT YOUR C/Sing WHICH YOU WOULD HATE TO BE ASKED? ________

135. DO YOU STILL HAVE ATTENTION ON ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS? ________

136. IS THERE ANOTHER QUESTION I SHOULD HAVE ASKED YOU? ________

137. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALF-TRUTH? ________

138. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH? ________

139. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? ________

140. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD ALL? ________

Give the pc the Proclamation of Forgiveness:

BY THE POWER INVESTED IN ME, ANY OVERTS AND WITHHOLDS YOU HAVE FULLY AND TRUTHFULLY TOLD ME ARE FORGIVEN BY SCIENTOLOGISTS.

On any adverse reaction to the Proclamation of Forgiveness, get the rest of the withhold or repair the withhold session. (Ref: HCOB 10 Nov. 78RA, PROCLAMATION: POWER TO FORGIVE)

Note: If this is being done as an HCO Confessional, the Proclamation of Forgiveness is omitted.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Assisted by Mission Issues Revision

Hubbard, L. R. (1980, 23 November). Case Supervisor Confessional. Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Subject Vol. 4, pp. 668-76). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes

  1. Document studied on the Hubbard Senior Security Checker Course. ↩

Filed Under: Cult Interrogation Tech Tagged With: Amprinistics, HSSC, Interrogation, security checks

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Scientology's "Suppressive Person" mask

Transcript: The SP Doctrine on Trial

Footer

Recent Posts

  • Twelve Characteristics, Eleven GO Felons (2019)
  • Speaking up for SPs to David Miscavige (2019)
  • SPDL: Speaking up for SPs (2019)
  • News: Scientology Cult Shut Down Over Shady Land-Grabbing Black Ops in Moscow
  • Book: Dianetics The Modern Science Of Mental Health: Chapter 1 (excerpt)

Tags

black propaganda chaos merchant criminals David Miscavige dead agent enemy Ethics evil purposes Fair game FDA FPRD Gerry Armstrong Glossary GO Intelligence Course government HFPRDA How to Confront and Shatter Suppression PTS/SP Course HSSC illness intelligence Interrogation L. Ron Hubbard legal Mary Sue Hubbard NCG OSA overts overts and withholds personnel requirements PR psychiatrists psychiatry psychosis PTS Rehabilitation Project Force rock slammers roller coaster RPF Russia scapegoating Scientology security Sea Org security checks SP Doctrine Suppressive Person

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro (Edited on 1 June 2017) on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in