OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS
14 October 1988
OSA Network Order No. 111
All Execs & Staff
(Taken from an LRH despatch.)
HCO PL 17 Feb. 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION
HCO PL 18 Feb. 66 ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY
HCO PL 25 Feb. 66 ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY
HCO PL 16 Feb. 69 BATTLE TACTICS
HCO PL 16 Feb. 69 TARGETS, DEFENSE
There was and probably still is an international conspiracy to attack, black PR and crush Dianetics and Scientology.
The GO never really got to the bottom of this conspiracy despite the fact that the same stories and the same pattern of black PR emerged simultaneously internationally.
We know that the GO itself was turned and so we cannot guarantee that their search was either honest or well directed.
SOURCE OF ATTACKS
For a long time I have looked for a source of these attacks the Church has been experiencing.
There are numerous indicators that psychologists (who are under the thumb of the psychiatrists) have mounted attacks on Dianetics and Scientology and their organizations.
The J. Edgar Hoover attack of the mid-‘50s and onward was, I think, instigated by the American Medical Association and the AMA acts as a sort of parent to
psychiatrists and psychologists. It goes this way: The psychologists, to practice, have to remain under the wing and supervision of psychiatrists. Psychiatrists, to practice, have to be medical doctors and under the wing of the American Medical Association.
There are innumerable interlocking organizations, all adding up to the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association and possibly the American Psychological Association, which interlock in organizations funded by the Rockefellers. I looked into this in New York in 1973 and was absolutely astounded at the number of organizations and associations grouped in that direction. Although they deny it, the Rockefellers also own a heavy share of the American drug industry which interlocks with the American Medical Association and at one time the drug lobby in Washington interlinked with the Food and Drug Administration in those FDA attacks on the E-Meter.
The original Commonwealth attack was from the British Psychological Association in Australia. The first attack on Dianetics was engineered by the Psychology Department of the George Washington University in 1950.
NATURE OF ATTACKERS
Now please take the following very seriously: In all of the years from 1950 onward that I was handling attacks as Executive Director, I never failed once to establish beyond any doubt the criminality and criminal background of any attacker. It became a very stable datum with me in investigating attackers to immediately look for their criminal backgrounds. At one time, in 1954/55, there were about 21 persons who were attacking the Church and almost casually I ran the backgrounds of these down and found that 18 of them had flagrant criminal backgrounds—and by criminal I mean criminal in the eyes of the courts or law. The reason why three remained outstanding is I got tired of the investigation. The last three were never investigated.
In South Africa a primary attacker was found to be an illegal diamond buyer. So the criminal background of attackers is well established.
You would undoubtedly find that the more serious litigants against the Church have criminal backgrounds of their own.
Criminals can be directly influenced by psychologists and psychiatrists both by blackmail and implanting (which goes on all the time today) and are easily used as pawns or patsies in instigating attacks.
Based rather solidly on their psychotic nature and their actions, attackers are engaged in actual flagrant crimes. It just follows, knowing the pattern of behavior of beings, that they did not just start to act that way when they collided with us. Such behavior is a repeating pattern and there would be all sorts of, at least, false reports, crimes and other matters in their pasts.
Some attackers may have been in prison or in institutions and when they came out, may have changed their names and identities. This is based on a knowledge of what such people do. Therefore it follows that their current names may not be their real names. This could provide direction that might be followed up with private investigators.
It would be of great benefit to actually run down the core of these international attacks.
It might be wise to turn private investigators loose along the lines as given above with this type of approach:
a) to run back all the connections of key attackers,
b) to run down their pasts for sure and for real to see how these interlock with any possible international conspiracy to suppress Dianetics and Scientology.
You may zero in on such a conspiracy and get to the actual instigators of the attacks. At the very least it would give you leads which would be invaluable.
Such an investigation might seem to be costly but I would think it would be very costly not to do it.
L. RON HUBBARD