Suppressive Person Defense League

Main navigation

You are here: Home / Archives for evil purposes

evil purposes

by Leave a Comment

HCOB: The “Lost Tech” of Handling Overts and Evil Purposes

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 6 JUNE 1984R1; 2
Issue IV
REVISED 12 JANUARY 1990

(Also issued as an HCO PL, same date and title)

Remimeo
Auditors
C/Ses
MAAs/Ethics Offs
Cramming Officers
HCO
Tech
Qual
HSSC Checksheet
False Purpose RD Auditors and C/Ses

False Purpose Rundown Series 2R

THE “LOST TECH” OF HANDLING OVERTS AND EVIL PURPOSES

Refs:

HCO PL 7 Feb. 65 KSW Series 1 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
HCO PL 17 June 70RB    KSW Series 5R Rev. 25.10.83 TECHNICAL DEGRADES
HCOB 28 Feb. 84 C/S Series 118 PRETENDED PTS
HCOB 13 Oct. 82 C/S Series 116 ETHICS AND THE C/S
HCOB 9 Feb. 79R KSW Series 23R Rev. 23.8.84 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH CHECKLIST
HCOB 15 Feb. 79 KSW Series 24 VERBAL TECH: PENALTIES
HCO PL 17 Jan. 79 A NEW TYPE OF CRIME

In a recent review of several cases, I’ve unearthed some vital tech in the fields of pulling overts and handling evil purposes that had been “lost” (buried) by certain SPs who’ve long since departed. This tech has now been put fully back into use and—with the addition of totally new breakthroughs on the handling of evil purposes—is more powerful than ever.

HISTORY

In early days I developed Security Checking to a high skill, whereby the meter was used to get the exact time, place, form and event nailed down on every overt.

In later years, in rundowns such as Expanded Dianetics, Sec Checking was covertly knocked out of use through verbal tech. This got to the point where some cases, not having been unburdened of later overts and withholds with Sec Checking, were sent off down the track in search of early overts and evil purposes well beyond the confront and reality of the preclear. Attempts were sometimes made to use high-powered L&N questions on such pes to locate evil purposes and intentions to run. Burdened with unpulled overts, the pcs had a hard time answering such questions.

A few unscrupulous persons who themselves were strenuously avoiding being sec checked put this “tech” out in issues. It of course threw a wrench into the works and was one of the main tricks they pulled in an effort to undermine the workability of Expanded Dianetics.

Sec Checking tech was, some years later, put back into use with a vengeance and many pcs got excellent gains from it. But not all of the tech was restored: The tech of handling evil purposes had been omitted!

What happened was that a “pendulum swing” effect had occurred. At one extreme, only straight pulling of overts and withholds close to present time was stressed. And at the other extreme, scant attention was paid to skilled Sec Checking of the pc’s current or recent withholds and, instead, auditors were guiding pcs in a search for whole track incidents and evil purposes exclusively.

SUCCESS

The fact is that any auditing aimed at handling the basic factors that can stall a case cannot succeed up to its full potential unless it includes BOTH:

A. THOROUGH, VIGOROUS PULLING OF THE PC’S OVERTS, AND

B. TRACING THE OVERT BACK TO E/S OVERTS ON THAT CHAIN AND BACK TO THE UNDERLYING EVIL PURPOSE AND CARRYING IT THROUGH TO A FULL BLOW.

I have since restored the tech of Sec Checking to full use and it is working very well in the hands of skilled auditors.

But now we have the brand-new, startlingly direct and powerful tech of the False Purpose Rundown! Based on discoveries made in upper level research this new rundown has produced spectacular results, including the undoing of psychs’ suppressive actions of long, long ago. But for an auditor to be able to use this new tech he must first be a skilled Sec Checker.

This does not mean that the technology of Sec Checking cannot be used, nor is this HCO PL intended to prevent people from being sec checked as part of HCO investigatory or justice actions. Sec Checking is a vital tool in its own right.

ETHICS

If in the future any person is found to be omitting or refusing to deliver the False Purpose RD or related RDs when needed, or doing something else and calling it “False Purpose RD,” he may be called before a Committee of Evidence on a charge of:

ATTEMPTING TO UNDERMINE OR ADVISING OR ENCOURAGING OR CONDONING THE ABANDONMENT OR REDUCTION OF USE OF THE FULL TECHNOLOGY OF LOCATING AND HANDLING OVERTS, EVIL PURPOSES, DESTRUCTIVE INTENTIONS AND NONSURVIVAL CONSIDERATIONS.

This offense is classified as a high crime, and if proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt by a Committee of Evidence, the offender may be declared suppressive and expelled from the Church.

SUMMARY

In this technology lies the key to sanity, certainty, reach and ability. Only the truly suppressive would wish to see it neglected or abandoned.
With this tech in your good hands and well applied, their wish will fade away as they do.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Hubbard, L. R. (1984, 5 June). The “Lost Tech” of Handling Overts and Evil Purposes. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology, (1991 ed., Subject Volume 3: 711-13.) Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes

by Leave a Comment

HCOB: False Purpose Rundown

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 JUNE 1984R1
REVISED 11 JANUARY 1990

BPI
Remimeo
Auditors
C/Ses

False Purpose Rundown Series 1R

FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN

Refs:

Book: Advanced Procedure & Axioms, Chapter “Postulates”
Book: Scientology 0-8: The Book of Basics, Chapter “Consideration and Mechanics”
HCOB 27 Mar. 84 C/S Series 119 STALLED DIANETIC CLEAR: SOLVED
HCOB 30 July 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING

That beings are basically good and are seeking to survive are two fundamental principles of Scientology.

A being’s basic goodness can be made brightly evident or be heavily obscured, the quality of his life and survival potential can be enhanced or reduced, all through a factor fundamental to the thetan himself: PURPOSES.

Where a being has accumulated nonsurvival purposes and intentions, he will be found to be having, doing and being far below his potential. Having committed overt acts (prompted by false, nonsurvival intentions and purposes), he then restrains himself from action. Achievement, stability, certainty, respect for self, and even the thetan’s innate power can seem to deteriorate or disappear altogether.

And it can be found that many of these contrasurvival purposes have been fettering the being for a VERY long time. Recent upper-level research breakthroughs have led to the development of a new rundown designed to slash straight through to the root of such false purposes and unwanted intentions and BLOW them.

The name of this new rundown is the FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN.

RESEARCH

The tech research done was quite extensive and involves several major discoveries. But I’ll let you in on one thing: There were psychiatrists who existed way, way back on the track.

It was the aim of these psychs back on the whole track to very carefully push in people’s anchor points to prevent them from reaching. The psychs were, themselves, a bunch of terrified cowards, and the prevention of reaching was one facet of their operation. Handling overts, withholds and nonsurvival purposes with the False Purpose Rundown has proven highly effective in undoing the effects of the “work” of psychs on the whole track, and restoring the thetan’s willingness and ability to reach.

DELIVERY

The False Purpose Rundown may only be delivered by an auditor who has completed the HUBBARD FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN AUDITOR (HFPRDA) Course, where one studies the materials of the new tech breakthroughs and masters the laser-precise techniques of False Purpose Rundown auditing. The rundown may only be C/Sed by a Class V Graduate C/S (or above) who also has been thoroughly trained in the tech of the False Purpose Rundown as both an auditor AND a Case Supervisor.

The auditing is very fast and very direct.

And—hold your hat—though it is the result of research into the far reaches of the OT band, it can be delivered to persons who have just begun on their way up the Bridge! Case prerequisites for the rundown are determined by the Case Supervisor, based on the pc’s drug history and personality test results. Some pcs will need no prior case actions at all. (Ref: HCOB 12 Nov. 81RB, GRADE CHART STREAMLINED FOR LOWER GRADES)

RESULTS

Pcs and pre-OTs report—and folder studies confirm—a very high rate of case gain per hour of auditing on this rundown, with unwanted fixed conditions and considerations dropping away left and right. Barriers to enjoyment of life and attainment of goals that before seemed solid and formidable can be whisked away like a puff of smoke before a fresh gust of wind. What would be left if such barriers were gone? Certainty of self and one’s basic purposes and intentions—and a revitalized reach, drive and confidence in one’s ability to achieve them, free from self-restraint.

And that spells a better game!

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Revision assisted by LRH Technical Research and Compilations

Hubbard, L. R. (1984, 5 June). False Purpose Rundown. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology, (1991 ed., Subject Volume 3: 709-10.) Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes

by Leave a Comment

HCOPL: Three Classes of People

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 MARCH 1984

Remimeo
Execs
Estos
All Networks
Senior HCO
HCOs
QuaIs
HCO Boards of Review
Missionaires

Establishment Officer Series 58

THREE CLASSES OF PEOPLE

(Ref:

HCO PL 25 Mar. 63 MODEL HAT FOR AN EXECUTIVE
HCO PL 23 Feb. 78 BOARD OF REVIEW
HCO PL 24 Feb. 72 INJUSTICE
HCO PL 29 Mar. 82 Personnel Series 40, PERSONNEL POLICY)

People generally fall into three types:

1. Those who go along handling life,

2. Those who get into bad situations occasionally and have to be pulled out of them, and

3. Those who are incorrigibly making sure that nothing ever gets anywhere.

This is a very high generality but it has some workability in application.

Those in category 1 don’t need any correction and are self-correcting.

Those in category 2 can be corrected and will then fly right.

Those in category 3 are simply dedicated losers and will continue to be dedicated losers until they have been put through an extensive program of Sec Checking and PTS checking for non-survival considerations and evil purposes on all dynamics.

It usually depends on the person’s track record but mostly whether the person has actually been productive or counterproductive as a way of life.

This data is especially relevant to execs, HCOs and Quals.

Boards of Review also should know this data as sometimes people in the middle category are unjustly removed or dismissed when they should have simply been corrected. Sometimes people in the first or second category are gotten rid of by people in the last category. So this too must be watched for.

In investigating along these lines, your target is simply justice or injustice.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder1

Notes

  1. This policy is listed on SPD 139 30 May 1986 PTS/SP Checksheet Part One B37. ↩

by Leave a Comment

HCOB: Stalled Dianetic Clear: Solved

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 MARCH 19841

Remimeo
All Orgs
Tech/Qual
C/Ses
Auditors
Sec Checkers
Solo C/Ses


URGENT—IMPORTANT

C/S Series 119

STALLED DIANETIC CLEAR: SOLVED

(This bulletin modifies any earlier HCOBs on the subject of what can or cannot be run on Dianetic Clears.)


Refs:
Book: Advanced Procedure and Axioms, 1951, Chapter “Postulates”
Book: Scientology 0-8, Chapter 3, “Consideration and Mechanics”
HCOB 6 Sept. 78 II SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS
HCOB 6 Sept. 78 III ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS
HCOB 12 Sept. 78 DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTs
HCOB 3 May 80 PC INDICATORS
HCOB 30 July 80 THE NATURE OF A BEING
HCOB 14 Dec. 81 THE STATE OF CLEAR
HCOB 8 Mar. 82R CONFESSIONALS AND THE NON-INTERFERENCE ZONE
HCOB 28 Feb. 84 C/S Series 118 PRETENDED PTS

Note: Earlier, various persons carefully obliterated the technical data given below (and the tech of Expanded Dianetics) from use, to effectively bar Dianetic Clears from going any further up the Bridge and becoming fully powerful beings.

The major steps for a Dianetic Clear moving up the Bridge are:

CCRD and the Sunshine Rundown

Solo Auditor Course Part 1

OT Preparations/Solo Setups

Solo Auditor Course Part 2

Eligibility for OT Levels Check.

There is no reason to interfere with a Dianetic Clear who is progressing on that route or who is progressing on the route between OT I and OT III and doing well. They should not be interfered with by Sec Checking or anything else, really.

But where the person in this zone is moving slowly or stalled, there is a technical factor which must be known and taken into consideration:

Dianetic Clears who do not go up the Bridge are still subject to the vagaries and pressures of life.

Therefore, to handle any of the points of possible hang up, the following are included as allowed handlings on a Dianetic Clear:

PTS handlings, but no Dianetics

Confessionals, including Sec Checking on evil purposes

The handling of postulates, considerations, attitudes, evil purposes or evil intentions

False purpose checks

O/Ws

Disagreement Checks

Black PR handling

Service fac handling (by the bracket method only, which does NOT use engram running)

Rudiments

Happiness Rundown

Scientology Drug Rundown (as it uses Recalls), only if required

Method One Word Clearing

End of Endless Int Rundown, only if required (Note: This is a major rundown, not a repair action.)

and the Flag-only rundowns of L10, L11, L12.

The following actions can also be done to assist a Dianetic Clear who is stalled or not actively moving up the Bridge:

Ethics condition formulas

Repair of Past Ethics Conditions

Conditions and Exchange by Dynamics

Actions given in the Product Debug Series HCOBs (False Data Stripping, Crashing Mis-U Word Finding, Product Debug Checklist, etc.)

Getting the 21-department org board in in one’s own life.

POSTULATES

The fact that one can sec check a Dianetic Clear and can locate purposes and nonsurvival considerations does not in the least make less of the state of’ Clear. It is simply a matter of a different case phenomena on a Clear than on a preclear.

The definition of Clear is:

A BEING WHO NO LONGER HAS HIS OWN REACTIVE MIND.

Postulates and considerations can stand independently of mental mass. Therefore, if anybody said you couldn’t find postulates or try to spot them on Dianetic Clears then that is false data.

One can locate all the postulates one wants on a Dianetic Clear so long as he doesn’t go into running engrams. Finding postulates and considerations is a free field on a Dianetic Clear; there is no slightest prevention of it. Finding and handling evil purposes is also in the area of postulates. And a Dianetic Clear can also be black PRed and go PTS.

Because someone is Dianetic Clear is no reason he does not still have postulates in place or counter-survival considerations which, cleared up, could improve his power as a being.

You will find that people who are not burdened with overts and black PR and evil purposes ARE going on up the route to the top. What stalls the person is lack of Sec Checking and discovery of any PTSness or black PR or evil purposes and the like—all of them counter-survival.

THE TECHNICAL FACT IS THAT IF THE PERSON IS NOT GETTING ON UP THE LEVELS, IF HE IS CLEAR AND/OR IS IN THE NON-INTERFERENCE ZONE AND IS MOVING SLOWLY OR STALLED, HE IS A CANDIDATE FOR HANDLING OF THESE FACTORS.

The handling of a Dianetic Clear on these is the same as for any preclear, with the proviso that no engram running may be attempted. One CAN handle postulates, purposes, considerations, attitudes, evil purposes or intentions and O/Ws. One can do false purpose checks, Disagreement Checks, black PR handlings, service fac handling (without running engrams) and rudiments on a Dianetic Clear, and one can also do all types of PTS handling that do not call for running engrams. And one had better get the appropriate handling done in such cases. You’ll find the person experiences huge relief from being rid of these nonsurvival factors and he can then move on up to his next level and get the gains that are there to be achieved.

SUMMARY

It is expected that responsible technical terminals will ensure the needed handling gets done where a Dianetic Clear is not progressing well.

A person at the point of Clear should take effective measures to get himself up the Bridge.

But where this is not occurring, he needs help in the form of the exact technical action that will enable him to progress.

We are in the business of making beings more able. Here we have restored to use powerful tools with which to do it.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Hubbard, L. R. (1984, 27 March). Stalled Dianetic Clear: Solved. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. (1991 ed., Vol. XII, pp. 558-61.). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes

by Leave a Comment

Flag Order: RPF Graduation

SEA ORGANIZATION

FLAG ORDER 3434RE-9

10 March 19841

All SO Orgs and Units
RPFs
Senior Quals
Senior C/S Int Office
Inspector General Network

(This Flag Order was originally issued as FO 3863, RPF Series 16, RPF GRADUATION. Reissued 8 May 1997 to correct the FO and RPF Series numbers.)

RPF Series 9

RPF GRADUATION

Regardless of other requirements for graduation from any Rehabilitation Project Force of the Sea Organization, the following requirement is in effect on receipt of this FO.

No person may be graduated from the RPF without full application of the recovered technology on Sec Checking2 and PTS checking3 for nonsurvival considerations and evil purposes on all dynamics*.

Further, to ensure the expert and nonsquirrel application of the technology, the folders and final results of the action must be passed by a representative of the Office of Senior C/S Int4 and the Inspector General Network of RTC.

This applies regardless of the case level of the person involved.

The Rehabilitation Project Force was established to rehabilitate and rehabilitation is often not possible without the expert application of this technology.

L. RON HUBBARD
COMMODORE

LRH:ma

*For data on what “PTS checking for nonsurvival considerations and evil purposes on all dynamics” is, see HCOB 28 Feb. 84, C/S Series 118, PRETENDED PTS.5

Unpublished Work created 1974, 1997 L. Ron Hubbard Library
All Rights Reserved.

Notes

  1. Image of this document: Page 1 ↩
  2. See Cult Interrogation Tech. ↩
  3. See Key Documents: SP Doctrine ↩
  4. According to a CSI publication: “Part of Snr C/S Int’s office is the LRH Technical Research and Compilations Unit (RTRC). This unit has the responsibility of compiling unpublished LRH materials according to his exact instructions. These materials thus become available in accordance with HCO PL 7 February 1965 (corrected and reissued 12 October 1985) KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING, “One: HAVING THE CORRECT TECHNOLOGY.” All compilations of L. Ron Hubbard’s materials done by RTRC are verified by the Religious Technology Center.” CSI (1988). The Command Channels of Scientology (p.11.) ↩
  5. See HCOB Pretended PTS. ↩

by Leave a Comment

HCOB: Pretended PTS

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 28 FEBRUARY 19841; 2

(Also issued as an HCO PL, same date and title.)

Remimeo
Execs
MAA/EO Hat
HCO
Tech/Qual C/Ses
Sec Checkers
De-PTSers
PTS Packs
SSOs
Missionaires

C/S Series 118

PRETENDED PTS

(This data is also issued as an HCO PL so that executives know what to look for when somebody that they have requested be handled in Ethics hasn’t been handled.)

Refs:

HCOB 19 June 70 II C/S Series 8 CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATION

HCOB 3 May 80 PC INDICATORS

HCOB 13 Oct. 82 C/S Series 116 ETHICS AND THE C/S

HCO PL 11 May 65 ETHICS OFFICER HAT

HCOB 9 May 77 II PSYCHOSIS, MORE ABOUT

HCOB 28 Nov. 70 C/S Series 22  PSYCHOSIS

HCO Info Letter 2 Apr. 64 TWO TYPES OF PEOPLE

HUBBARD CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATION

It is evident that asking directly for evil purposes as part of Sec Checking has been knocked out of use over the years by SPs.

It recently occurred that, in using Sec Checking to clean up several persons who had gotten into ethics trouble on their posts, a peculiar phenomenon and pattern came to light. The persons being handled had been asked for “overts” before and had “gotten them off” but would continue committing the overts. In each case they had blamed their difficulty on having been the effect of false data and black PR fed them by bad hats long since detected and removed from the area. However, these particular cases did not straighten out with de-PTSing actions.

These persons were then asked directly for evil purposes and this action finally got to the root of the matter.

APPARENT SEQUENCE

Apparently, the sequence with such persons is:

a. They “get off overts” but then continue committing them.

b. When overt products and flaps in their areas get investigated, they palm it off as having “gone effect of others’ black PR or false data.” In other words, the person appears to be PTS.

c. They manage to convince those doing the investigating that that’s the end of the investigation.

d. If something flaps, they get off some overts and start the cycle again at (a).

In other words, they were actively committing suppressive actions while pretending to be PTS. And were busy making people around them feel PTS. While apparently the effect of suppression or black PR, they were actually generating it themselves: originating black PR to cover their own overt acts.

What had been omitted in the handlings these persons had gotten previously was the full follow-through, because routine PTS tech would of course not handle someone who was on the other side of the coin—and by pursuing it all the way through, it would have exposed the pretense.

We have in the (a) through (d) sequence above, the exact mechanism by which i such people skid through the lines undetected. This may explain a great deal to many executives who have ordered staff handled and then have had to conclude that the tech didn’t work because the staff wasn’t handled. What had actually occurred is that evil purposes had been omitted from Sec Checking tech with malice aforethought and that PTS checks did not include checks for evil purposes.

This sequence shows the exact “failure” to handle people in RPFs, etc.

HANDLING

In handling a PTS, the C/S must monitor the person’s progress closely. This means inspection of all interviews and session worksheets, observing the results of each PTS handling action, his change of position (or lack of) on the Chart of Human Evaluation as evident from the pc folder and so forth.

Also, it is important that the Ethics Officer advise the D of P when a staff or public person is undergoing an ethics or justice action so that this can be noted in the person’s pc folder. In this way, the C/S can also find out if the pc has landed in ethics trouble. (Ref: HCOB 13 Oct. 82, C/S Series 116, ETHICS AND THE C/S)

If the person is not making change, or repeatedly slipping into further out-ethics behavior, the C/S must recognize this. It is, possibly, the (a) to (d) sequence above in action. If the C/S suspects this to be the case, his action is to begin to handle the case with Sec Checking by a competent Sec Checker. And such Sec Checking must include questions about the person’s purposes and intentions.

Instead of only Sec Checking on, for example, “Have you committed an overt on the org?” one would also ask, “Have you had an evil purpose regarding the org?”

Handled standardly in this way, the person can be expected to experience tremendous relief and case change.

CAUTION

If a person is progressing well on a de-PTSing program (such as PTS interview, PTS RD, Suppressed Person RD), is making change, keeping his personal ethics in and moving up the Chart of Human Evaluation, then it would be a C/S error to suddenly interject a Sec Check into his program.

ETHICS

None of this sets aside standard ethics and justice procedures. Such a person as would be found with a pretended-PTS situation is quite likely already under some justice action, and in fact doesn’t deserve immediate handling other than what HCO deals out.

SUMMARY

Some executives have gotten in the frame of mind that it is a waste of time trying to handle a bad hat. It is true the bad hat probably doesn’t deserve to be handled but it is nevertheless true that we do have the tools to handle one.

We’re not out to handle the insane, but whether we like it or not we live in a pretty insane civilization. Any data which handles that or amplifies it technically or solves it is of course extremely vital.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Hubbard, L. R. (1984, 28 February). Pretended PTS. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. (1991 ed., Vol. XII, pp. 547-549). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes