Suppressive Person Defense League

You are here: Home / Archives for Germany

Germany

by Leave a Comment

Article: Major victories against suppression…

Major victories against suppression bring us another step closer to achieving the Aims of Scientology on Earth1

Along with bringing LRH tech to all levels of society, comes creating a safe environment in which we can provide that tech to ever greater numbers of people. To that end, Mr. Mike Rinder briefed those at the Patron Ball on the big picture of our progress on the external front, and how we are creating that safe environment for the continued expansion of Scientology.

He began with France, where suppressives have been vocal recently — but where they have now come up against a force they didn’t bargain on: us.

France, he pointed out, has a long track of religious intolerance, in a country that “hypocritically proclaims it stands for liberty, equality and fraternity.

“With that sort of bank agreement, it’s no surprise this country has been a magnet for SPs.

“Certain government quarters are literally infested with psychs.

“And those quarters are equally rife with corruption.

Their prime target is the field of religion — since religion stands as the only barrier to their materialistic theories of social control. Up to now, the SPs have been able to get away with their game of abolishing religion and its values in France — that is, until we came along.

And as he noted, now that we’re in the fight, their tactics are “more extreme and desperate than ever.”

Turning the tides in Germany

From France, Mr. Rinder traveled across to Germany, where, as he put it, “we have progressed a bit further, using our third dynamic tech to handle suppression and assume a leadership role.”

Notes

  1. From International Scientology News Issue 18 (2001 CSI) ↩

by Leave a Comment

OSA NWO: The Mechanism of Attack and Defense

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS NETWORK ORDER

OSA NW ORDER 40

OSA NW

30 May 19881

THE MECHANISM OF ATTACK AND DEFENSE

(Excerpted from LRH Tape 6310021 SH Special — 315, 21 Oct 1963, ATTACK AND GPMs. Issued as an OSA NW Order on 30 May 1988.)

I have to wear the Washington legal hat and go up there and solve their various difficulties for them.[1]

It’s a spectacle of people defending, defending. You know you can defend yourself into more holes and it has never occurred to them, on this one suit that has been going for about 5 years, to attack anybody. That would be very dangerous! Don’t attack anybody!

Look at the situation. Every time the enemy offers an attack, you defend against it and that is all you do. Any castle, to hold out, has got to sortie. The proper strategy for any battle is to find a weak point in the enemy lines and attack it.

The reason the United States is losing against communism is simply on these same mathematics. That they are losing is patent. All they are doing is defending the points attacked.

On this Berlin thing [2],  before it really came to a hot boil, the United States was not claiming any piece over there and so is never going to be able to swap Berlin for anything. The proper action is to go find something to collect as a piece. Yet there they stand, defending, defending, defending, defending. Well, don’t they want to win?

How about an auditor that sits there and defends and defends and defends and defends and defends against the attack of the pc? He never looks for the bypassed charge and he never does anything effective to straighten out the case. He just sits there and defends himself. He would last about 2 minutes. This is about the most dangerous thing you can do. Look it over. It is certainly the most unthetan thing you can do.

You can defend to a certain degree and you have to defend to a certain degree. But use 75% of your energies to attack and you will always win. Find a weak spot and attack it. Attack expertly and attack perfectly and don’t flub with the attack. Always put your concentration on the attack and you win every time.

People look awfully silly two miles in your rear without any supplies, without any ammunition, with no defenses and no place to go. They attacked all right. The whole front of the battle shifted. They attacked and you didn’t defend. You went and destroyed their supply dump. It is very embarrassing to have this sort of thing happen.

The whole of life is an interchange, if you’re going to live. It is an interchange activity. It is putting out
anchor points.

OSA NWO 40

—2 —

Let’s look at the gradient scale of how you would go about this.

Supposing you are just there all by yourself and there is no limitation to your putting out anchor points. You can put out as many anchor points as you like.

Somebody else shows up and says, “You shouldn’t put out these anchor points,” or, “I want to have some of this space too,” and they put out anchor points against your anchor points. So you don’t put out anchor points quite so far. I am talking about the Factors now.

Let’s suppose that every time you put out an anchor point, somebody else forbade you to put out the anchor point and you complied and agreed and didn’t put out your anchor point. How big do you think you would be after a while? That is about how big you are now. That is practically the way you got there.

There is nothing quite as disturbing and there is nothing quite so certain to throw anybody into apathy as just continuing to put out your anchor points. This is the most disturbing activity that you can engage in. Everybody says, “You mustn’t put out your anchor points,” and you put out your anchor points. Then they give you lots of reasons why you shouldn’t put out your anchor points and you put out anchor points. They bring all sorts of duress to bear on you on why you shouldn’t put out your anchor points and you put out your anchor points. What is going to happen to their morale?

I Sometimes it is very difficult to continue to put out anchor points in this particular way. Sometimes you just get cut to ribbons and it is those particular times that you got cut to ribbons you tend to remember as lessons not to attack or lessons not to put out anchor points.

The gradient scale on the thing goes: Putting out anchor points, in other words, continuing to create your space; to attacking that which is preventing you from’putting out your space. That is also putting out anchor points. And you get down along low human levels and what are you then involved with? You are involved with attacking those who are preventing you from putting out anchor points.

You go down scale just a little bit further and you start defending yourself against attacks. This causes you “to live good,” “to have good behavior,” to have various socially acceptable characteristics, all sorts of things. These things are basically defenses against attacks, direct attacks.

You can go downscale even further than that. You have the defenses against possible attacks and this causes people to live in castles, dig moats that nobody will ever think of charging against, invent weapons that have no particular use and invent social characteristics that are impossible to attack. This causes you, in other words, to go downscale a bit further.

There is a point further downscale than that, which is imagining that you are under attack. You are defending yourself against possible attacks. You are not being attacked — you are simply preparing yourself to defend possible attacks.

Just below that, there is a point where, because there are all these defenses, there therefore must he attacks. It proves itself. You have got a moat dug all the way around the place. Obviously there must be somebody going to ride across that moat.

OSA NWO 40

– 3 –

Some of the screens that a thetan puts up are terribly entrancing. These screens are very, very entrancing because they leave them up forever. why did they put them up in the first place? Well, they put them up against a lion. The lion might still be there. You would have to take the screen down to find out. You don’t dare take the screen down because you would be attacked if the lion were still there.

This causes a very funny action. You can get a thetan, a pc, and get him to find one of these black screens and get him to pick up one little corner of it and peek around it real fast. Sometimes he will really have to get his nerve up to do it —* and he will. He will see something like a mocked up lion or a snake or something on the other side of the black screen. One of his answers of confronting is to cover it up so he won’t have to confront it — black it out. There is the final mechanism of a defense.

Permanent defenses lead to a belief that one is under attack. when you get way down scale it must be that you are under attack because there are the defenses. Somebody must be ready to launch the rockets at you any moment, because here are all these radars waiting to detect them and of course, the more one defends, the less one becomes mobile. So therefore, actually, he never gets out to look if there are any attackers. And I imagine that there are nations on planets, someplace in this galaxy at this very moment, who have no neighbors, but who believe implicitly that those neighbors are there with full armies, ready to attack them and that live a life of complete defense, complete immobility, never going abroad, carrying through all of the various survival activities to prevent an attack against nations that are no longer there and that are long since gone to dust.

One has a defense up against an area of confusion. He has a stable datum all arranged to take care of an area of confusion that has long since ceased to exist. A thetan eventually traps himself.

What do you think are the chances of your opponents of trillions one hundred – trillions written one hundred times still being alive and kicking and ready to knock your block off? And yet, you have all the defenses for that period all rigged and all the stable data already there with those defenses against those confusions and attackers of trillions one hundred.

And that, in actual fact, is what a thetan is doing.

The above are mechanisms of defense of a certain kind of order. They are also, of course, mechanisms of attack. You will have to defend to a certain degree. But if you use 75% of your energies to attack, you will always win.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Adopted by
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

LRH:CSI:jk

OSA NWO 40

– 4 –

1 In wearing the Washington legal hat, LRH referred to having to handle the raids of the Food and Drug Administration on the Founding Church in Washington, D.C. In 1956 and 1958 the FDA seized Dianazene tablets and in January 1963 books and E-Meters. The FDA sued the D.C. Church. This suit was initially lost by the Church. However the Church appealed and won the appeal against the FDA. The FDA petitioned for rehearing the case and this petition was thrown out by the U.S. Court of Appeals. On 3 August 1971 LRH announced in the Orders of the Day: “We won our FDA (Food and Drug Administration attack on the E-Meter) case in a Washington Court. This gives the Church of Scientology exclusive rights to the E-Meter, wipes out all squirrels, confirms Scientology as a religion and restores our property – books and meters seized in ’63.” For further information on the FDA matter, see HCO Information Letter of 17 Dec 1963, RON’S JOURNAL No. 7, HCO Exec Letter of 7 Apr 1965, RON’S JOURNAL No. 11, SEC ED 45 WW E 301 SH, 9 Feb 1966, ENQUIRY RUMOUR U.K., OODS 6 Feb 1968, NEW NEWS, OODs 25 Apr 1969, GOOD NEWS, OODS 3 Aug 1971, BIG NEWS.

2 “This Berlin thing” refers to Berlin, the largest city in Germany which became the hottest issue in the Cold War between communism and democracy. The city of Berlin is located 110 miles inside communist controlled East Germany. Before World War II, Berlin was the capital of all Germany and with 4 million people was the largest industrial city in Europe. At the end of World War II in 1945, Berlin lay in ruins. Allied bombs had wiped out about a third of the city. More than a million people had been killed. Berlin surrended to the Russian army on May 2, 1945. Although Berlin lay deep within the Soviet zone of Germany, the Russians guaranteed the Western powers free access to the city. The Allies divided Berlin into four sectors and set up a four-power council to govern Berlin. Each ally occupied one sector. The three sectors occupied by American, French and British troops became known as West Berlin. The Russian sector is East Berlin. West Berlin soon became a gateway to freedom for hundreds of thousands of East Germans who wanted to escape communism. From 1945 to 1961, almost 3,000,000 people escaped to West Berlin. Then, on August 13, 1961, the communists sealed off the border between East and West Berlin with a  6-mile concrete and barbed wire wall across the city. They also boarded up windows and doors in buildings facing West Berlin. A few desperate refugees still managed to escape. But for most East Germans, the door to freedom had been shut tight. The Berlin issue came up over and over again in the Cold War of the 1950s and 1960s. Russian Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev demanded that Western powers withdraw from West Berlin and turn their sectors into a “free, demilitarized” city. The Western nations however insisted on staying to safeguard West Berlin from becoming defenseless against communist aggression.
Ref. World Book Encyclopedia.

Notes

by

OSA NWO: German Case

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

29 February 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1311

OSA Int/Conts
Execs
Production Bureaux Staff

Confidential
GERMAN CASE
(Originally written by LRH on 30 August 1973, concerning a suit against the German police for spreading false reports.)

I have no need to stress that this is a terribly important case. Underneath the surface for two decades police and Interpol have been used to spread false and damaging data to the press and governments. This line has been the cause of enormous losses and much labor.

We now have the opportunity to reverse the entire trend of events to such a degree that this could be the last battle of the war.

The strategy I advised had apparently worked: we can now sue the magazine independently, mop up the ground with them and then use them to attack the police in Germany.

The real target is Interpol.

The mechanism of subpoenaing papers, witnesses and depositions can now begin. If this is correctly conducted it will go like an ethics investigation of pulling strings. The suit then has two objectives, 1) to win an actual cash settlement and 2) to run to earth every contrary criminal conspiracy that has been at work for more than two decades.

If you did not go in for “damage to reputation” and used some other charge like placing in fear and jeopardy by falsifying records and publicizing false records as I advised your own defense will be minimal and your attack line maximal. I hope my “Suit Caution” arrived in time and was heeded.

Cleverly fought, evidence for a hundred suits in a dozen countries can be gathered in this German police suit. This is the lever that moves the world. Every enemy can be made to stand and deliver.

Any suit you now start can of course be cross-played in what you find about this German suit. Evidence in one area can be used in another and so forth.

Anyone handling this should be familiar with investigatory tech where you pull a string that leads to another string on and on until you find a General Sherman tank. Unless you sued on damage to repute, your opportunity for PR is endless. And so is your string pulling. Done correctly, the head of the German justice system will resign, the Home Secretary and head of Scotland Yard will also, the FBI and Justice and Treasury principals may very well pack up and Interpol will either fold or drastically reform. All these and other actions lie directly in your power. Ethics is going in on governments, look at Watergate. You are in the trend of the times and should make the most of it.

The enemy has made a colossal blunder, one of the kind that attorneys pray for. Not only were false reports being made but also illegally publicized. This is the sort of case that comes once in a lifetime.

Only some equally large technical blunder on our parts could lose it. Thus legal tech must be impeccable, no errors, no faults.

The sources of all their reports can be depositioned in addition to the records.

And when depositioned, if one can get names of where THEY got it, that can be set up for new deposition. And every deposition becomes bait for a perjury charge or damages and every evidence gained in A can be used in B. You will be able to run these attacks down to the “seventh generation” back.

Subpoena the record. “Where did you get these parts F, K, P and L?” By legal means pull F, K, P and L into it. “Where did you get that data?” And F, K, P and L give you G, R and J. “Where did you get that data?”

This will work because every one of these poor sods will plead they were innocent by quoting the “authority” from which they got their data. You get the “authority” in each case and lay grounds for new suits. It didn’t make anyone innocent, the data is false, so they are guilty. But each one will use that plea. So use the plea to get someone else onto the hot seat.

There will be an effort to prove their good faith by claiming that something dimly that way (like the charge) was true. You use this to prove the charge they did publish was false; I am sure they will not be able to resist this temptation, to claim only slight error; but the moment they claim ANY error they have pleaded guilty to issuing a false charge.

I trust you were able to sue for a billion. This in itself is PR, but factually these charges have caused far more loss than that over the decades.

You are not going to settle for less. You want this case to continue as long as you can bleed it for more cases. Ultimately you will be forced to accept a victory and payoff; by that time you will have the material for more and more cases, each one proven won by the fact that the last one before it won.

Your real target is Interpol. They are the pipeline. They have violated their charter. You can demand its cancellation as a conspiracy against all honest citizens. You will find that people will spook when it is asserted that THEY are on Interpol records with false charges too. Public opinion against secret police and violent police is being heeded: the “no-knock raiders” who were marshals breaking into US homes at first were just shrugged off by the Justice Department: this suddenly changed and a dozen of these marshalls have now been indicted. Governments are afraid of public reaction, they believe what they read in the press; you must make successful press out of this. Try them in the press. That’s why you must have PR firms.

Interpol offices have been releasing material unbeknownst to us all over the world. Who got them to do it? And who got THEM to do it?

You will be pulling the German Interpol office into this almost at once. This office as itself, not as Interpol, can be sued elsewhere. And main Interpol can be sued and its offices in any country.

You are not pressed for funds. They are at your disposal from any funds. Further, you can get subscriptions from members all over the world when you tell them this was what made it hard on all of us and that it is being remedied.

Various media will get pulled into it. ITV was there somewhere on that info handout line which undid any good we did. Their interviewers were sitting sniggering believing themselves safely holding true police reports. Cleverness will count in finding someone admitting they gave out these reports. And there goes ITV. And BBC. You see how the media chain can go.

That is why I was working on the central idea. It is best to estimate which way it went. Well you know of one direction per files and we are getting another. Scandal will be pulled into this to make press like 6 1/2 million dead Jews. The story will be that they were afraid of us because we knew who really did it and they have fought like trapped rats to prevent their exposure.

So out of this beginning you are going to complete the already begun reversal of the trend of the last few years. You are on the upswing already. This is going to send you zooming. This is going to turn it from a sneering “those” to “YES sir” to a member of the group.

It is axiomatic that he who tames a lion is now the lion tamer. Primitive man, which is to say modern man, turns to the victors.

So this one we win. No matter what skill, exactitude, cleverness or boldness that is required, whatever funds are needed, this one we win. For if we win it in all its main battles and outflung skirmishes, we will have won the world, certainly for our field. We have never had any real opponents technically or ethically. Now we will have a long hard-fought battle and we will have no opponents at all.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩

by Leave a Comment

HCO Info Ltr: Ron’s Journal No. 3 Political Treatment

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO INFORMATION LETTER OF 4 APRIL 19691; 2

Remimeo
BPI

TO: All Orgs

FROM: RON

SUBJECT: RON’S JOURNAL 1969 NO.3 POLITICAL TREATMENT

I’ve been studying the state of psychiatry and there can now be no doubt whatever that their “treatment” is political treatment and should be called such.

Electric shocks if not given show patients would leave 6 weeks earlier.

Brain “operations” result in total loss of body coordination and a bright normal being is turned into a drooling blob of flesh, unable even to retain urine. They live only briefly when they do not die at once on the operating table.

The only precedent for such “operations” is Hitler’s action in doing it much more lightly to 800,000 persons to make “farm slavery” or zombies.

The political color command and control of parliaments and legislatures by psychiatry are evident in the easy seizure without trial laws being passed or in the hypocritical actions like Ronald Reagan’s new bill in California that was hailed in the press as giving “rights” to patients in asylums (comparable to Geneva’s Prisoner of War Code) to refuse such treatment but the actual bill says in small print that the “doctor” can refuse any of these rights at his sole discretion. This equals a sentence to death without trial or even a crime.

In Dianetics insanity is shown to be common physical illnesses, yet asylums have no medical facilities. Dianetics can handle insanity with relative ease once the physical injuries and illnesses of the patient are cured medically or when the patient is only lightly ill. A new breakthrough on this is now being taught real MDs in England by a team I trained.

So there is an easy cure of insanity in ordinary medical treatment of broken, badly healed bones, bad kidneys, etc., plus easy Dianetic auditing.

Dianetics has been available and proven for 20 years. Yet psychiatric front groups have been able to command sufficient political action to prevent its use, instead getting bills passed to easily seize anyone, torture and kill him.

Thus the Western countries are seen to refuse actual treatment and legalize inhuman torture and brutality.

Psychiatric treatment is actually psychiatric political treatment, nothing more, to rid the world of anyone who might disagree.

Nelson Rockefeller’s “youth stockades” are for youths who might become delinquent, it says right there in the founding papers.

In Arizona federal judges sentence delinquents to electric shock or death for “being turbulative.”

Insanity is now defined as anyone who disagrees with the social autonomy.

The handwriting is plain. Only the government supports psychiatry. The public by survey stays thoroughly away from them. Death camps like the one just found in Cardiff are situated strategically over the West. Hitler at least wasn’t pretending to help anyone. He just wanted them dead.

So psychiatric activities consist of political treatment. That is very certain now.

This was the deadly secret we in Scientology might have found out and which made them terrified of us, ridicule us, fight us and spend over 2 million dollars to try unsuccessfully to get rid of us.

Over the world they were running death camps.

A few times they missed and certain political actions came to light — Ezra Pound the poet, Governor Long of Louisiana, General Walker of Little Rock, managed to become known about before they were depersonalized. So be mystified no longer. We weren’t up against any mental treatment — only violent brutality properly known as political treatment.

So that’s what we ought to brand it.

These dumb birds were trying to form a total police state, but the police hate them and the army deserts at every chance. How do you form a police state with the police and army on the side of the population?

That’s not their only mistake. Their biggest one was attacking us.

The commies would have won in the end.

Revolt is not far off if political treatment is allowed to continue.

Some of the “very best people” are involved.

If we can expose and eradicate this bestial tendency in Western government before it is too late, the society will not fall into the chaos desired for a communist takeover. It’s our one chance. Expose them fully and fast.

If we delay, the mobs will tear these government leaders limb from limb for other causes than political  treatments.

If exponents of death camps can be gotten out, Western governments may yet survive.

Remember that Pavlov 1870 and Wundt 1879 invented these technologies and every nation that used their work-Russia, Austria, Germany, Poland, has ceased to exist, their leaders brutally slain and the governments replaced by maniacs. So it is no idle prediction that the West, using now Wundt and Pavlov, are very close in their turn to going down in flames.

Man just doesn’t like being called an animal or treated like one. He revolts.

As he did in Russia, Poland, Germany, Austria, and got real beasts in charge instead.

The “best people” in the West who support psychiatry and look to it to seize their mob leaders and “clean up dissident elements” had better try to remember their history since 1789.

A lot of “best people” then and since have been made awfully dead at the hands of mobs.

This is not the Middle Ages. It is the twentieth century. Human rights not death camps are the fashion today.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes