Suppressive Person Defense League

You are here: Home / Archives for Gerry Armstrong

Gerry Armstrong

by

Letter to David Miscavige

November 23, 2006

David Miscavige
Religious Technology Center
1710 Ivar Avenue, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90028 U.S.A.

Also by E-mail

Dear Mr. Miscavige:

As you know, I am the Gerry Armstrong identified on the Scientology web sites religiousfreedomwatch.com , religiousfreedomwatch.org and religiousfreedomwatch.net . This letter is a demand that you immediately have all references to me removed from these sites.

You and Scientology first published the web pages on your sites that now contain references to me on or about October 20, 2006.

As you know, your Scientology organization junior Joel Phillips is identified as the administrative contact for these three sites, and I am therefore copying this demand to him.

Because of your reported policy and practice of denying receipt of communications that are sent to you directly from your targets and victims, which includes me, I am also copying this demand letter to a number of other Scientology organization personnel and components junior to you in the global Scientology enterprise. In that way, since you control every component of Scientology and direct all organization personnel, and since you require publicly that all personnel report all such communications and situations as mine to RTC, I am prudently doing what is reasonable to reduce or eliminate any temptation you might entertain to delay responding to this demand by pretending you didn’t get it. If you say you get it and you’d like to communicate one to one without the whole world having to have every word, that would be fine with me.

The truth, known to you beyond any rational doubt, is that I am not an anti-religious extremist, in any sane meaning of the term. The clear and unlawful reason that you have positioned and labeled me on these sites as an anti-religious extremist is to facilitate my obliteration. Positioning and identifying me as an anti-religious extremist is black propaganda, and done to cause the intended effect for black PR stated in your Scientology scriptures, which you know and enforce.

As you know, I am as far as a person can reasonably get in a lifetime from being an anti-religious extremist. Your libel that I am an anti-religious extremist is particularly hurtful, insane and threatening because you are actively prosecuting a massive, multimillion dollar anti-religious judicial and extra-judicial campaign to suppress and destroy my basic human rights, including, most egregiously, my freedom of religion. Virtually all your juniors in the Scientology religion and organization in every country of the world, including Phillips, participate in this religious persecution campaign against me that you control and direct. As I have often pointed out, you are all contracted legal beneficiaries in your litigation war against me, which is using wog secular courts, agencies and lines of communication to suppress and destroy my religious liberty and the religious liberty of my classes, widely “Suppressive Persons” and narrowly those SPs acting in concert with me

I am not arguing that anti-religious extremists do not exist, and indeed I would argue that you yourself are, on a gradient scale of anti-religious extremists, an extreme or extremely anti-religious extremist. I cannot, however, speak for or about all the other people on your sites whom you identify as anti-religious extremists, and I have, as you cannot but know, no way of knowing if some are anti-religious extremists or not. A few of them very well may be anti-religious extremists. Some of them, in fact, may very well be your agents or covert operatives, and included on your sites because perhaps they act the part of anti-religious extremists. You then associate and position me, and whoever else isn’t an anti-religious extremist and doesn’t act the part, with your actors. I don’t know. I do know, however, with complete clarity, that I am not an anti-religious extremist in any sane meaning of the word. I also know, as I said above, that you cannot but know that I am correct, and that you are willfully falsely identifying and labeling me as an anti-religious extremist with manifest malice.

With the understanding that I cannot know if some of the people you identify and classify as anti-religious extremists may be anti-religious extremists, I do know that those I know personally reasonably well, are most certainly, like me, absolutely not anti-religious extremists in any sane meaning of the term. I will also copy these people and suggest that they also protest their being falsely, maliciously and threateningly vilified as anti-religious extremists on your sites, and demand you remove any reference to them. There is, however, no reason for me to take up their cases with you at this time. I know how thoroughly wrong you are about me, and I reasonably extrapolate you being just as wrong about more people around the world, including a significant percentage of the people identified and attacked on your web sites as anti-religious extremists.

As I’ve documented and demonstrated in several legal proceedings, your Scientology head predecessor L. Ron Hubbard spelled out in your scriptures what you are doing in black PRing me as an anti-religious extremist on your sites, and why you and your Scientology juniors are doing it. In his 1969 directive “Battle Tactics ” Hubbard ordered that Scientology and Scientologists are to degrade the images of people like me to beast level, and drive public opinion into a frenzy of hate against us. He ordered that Scientology and Scientologists are then to just go all the way in and obliterate us. You had the “Battle Tactics” scripture reissued in 1987, the year after Hubbard’s death, and you had it included in Scientology intelligence training manuals in 1991. You are responsible, Scientology wide, for the enforcement of all scripture, and all application of scriptural directives, including Battle Tactics.

Obviously, the most beastly, degraded image imaginable is of anti-religious extremists. The public hates anti-religious extremists, and hates to be associated with anti-religious extremists. The public accepts that anti-religious extremists are so hateful it’s legitimate to attack or pursue them, to cut off their communications, funds and connections, to deprive them of political advantages and power, to raid and harass them, and to take over their possessions and territories. Clearly, by obliteration and by your behavior, you mean me death or physical harm as well as other forms of harm, and consequently I have been at all times and continue to be in physical danger as well as in other forms of danger from you and your juniors and agents. Your hate sites black PRing me as an anti-religious extremist are intended to generate so much public hatred against me that the world cheers when I’m obliterated, and to generate so much hatred against me within your Scientology enterprise that it’s a snap getting someone to just go all the way in to do the obliterating.

I recognize that your three hate sites listed above that willfully, wrongly, maliciously and threateningly vilify me as an anti-religious extremist comprise only one weapon system in one channel in a multi-channeled and international campaign to suppress and destroy me. Removing references to me from these sites will not guarantee, or even mean, that you and your juniors have ended your war on me. There are many more actions you and Scientology must take, and other actions you must stop taking, to work toward peacefully ending the Scientology v. Armstrong or Miscavige v. Armstrong war. The corrections and reparations you and Scientology must make are also on multiple channels, and will extend through some time. The first action toward that end, however, which you can do immediately, is to have any reference to me removed from your Internet hate sites.

As you cannot but be aware, I have identified you for some time as a sociopath. I think this is clarifying for everyone, and good for you as well because it gives you a real and immediate public opportunity to take your sociopathy by the horns and pen it up. Your reported history as Scientology head of physically beating people, your agents’ physical attacks on me and death threats, your continued operation and promotion of the murderous “Suppressive Person” doctrine , your bragging of shooting down people like ducks in a pond , and many other indicators, show that you are a sociopath of a violent stripe.

You and your Scientology juniors have conspired against me in violation of laws and moral and social norms for almost 25 years. Throughout those years, you have willfully falsely labeled and black PRed me as an “SP,” meaning in Scientology, as twisted by Hubbard, a “sociopath.” To get your 1993 tax exemption and “religion status,” you black PRed me in official documents as “psychotic.” And now you label me an anti-religious extremist. There is a statistically negligible chance that you will have a change of heart and cease your sociopathy, simply because you are a sociopath.

Nevertheless, I know that with God all things are possible, and certainly He can raise anyone above his sociopathy with the slightest willingness. This knowledge is itself adequate proof, it should be clear, that I am not in any way an anti-religious person, let alone an anti-religious extremist as you label me. There is also a chance that some smart good people in Scientology will get together and prevail upon you and upon your other organization juniors to do the sane, decent and lawful thing and remove your black PR on me from your hate sites. Thus, I am still hoping that the war you and your Scientology juniors wage on me can be ended without obliteration and more terror, and I writing you in that hope.

As you know, a number of your Scientologist juniors such as Barbara Schwarz or hired operatives have the hat of spreading your web sites’ black propaganda onto Usenet to further incite hatred and threat toward me, and toward all of the individuals you label anti-religious extremists on your sites. I will therefore post this demand letter to ensure that as many people as possible who are involved in Scientology’s war on wogs on Usenet, including, of course, your junior Scientologists and operatives, get the message as well. I will also web it.

Within a reasonable time, which is really up to you, I will begin the process of retaining an attorney to represent me in any potential legal action necessary to compel you and your Scientology juniors to remove the references to me from your hate sites. I will forward this letter to various government officials and media representatives who know or should know about Scientology’s antisocial and criminal activities. Because of the specific and immediate nature of your actions and of this demand I will also copy this letter to Tom Cruise, who recently has publicly identified you as his best friend. I do this in the hope that he isn’t also a sociopath, and that he can get you help, or at least talk to you about removing the references to me on your hate sites. I’ve seen that you are honeymooning together on a yacht as I send this letter, so this could be an ideal time for you and Cruise, and probably Ms. Holmes now, to talk about the antisocial and criminal things you’ve been doing and having Scientology do, the ignominy you bring to Scientologists, and most urgently your black PRing me as an anti-religious extremist on your hate sites.

I won’t list all the false statements about me on your sites at this time. You know what the truth is, and you know how big a liar you are. I will mention five willful lies that relate to your declaring and vilifying me as an anti-religious extremist.

1. “In 2000, Armstrong traveled to Europe to attend an anti-religious conference in Leipzig, Germany.”
The event I attended in Leipzig, in multiple years as you know, had nothing whatsoever to do with anti-religion. Religious people from many countries participated, and all people who participated were joined by the common desire for religious liberty everywhere. Events at these Leipzig events are very well recorded and documented, and you cannot but know that all the Leipzig events that I attended, if they were in any way at all religious, were pro-religious.

2. “In 2001, Armstrong traveled extensively in Europe, joining in a hate march in France with extremist Roger Gonnet”
I have never joined in a hate march in France, or at any other time or place in my life. I know Roger Gonnet personally, and spent some days with him in France and elsewhere. At no time did I ever see him join in a hate march, and indeed at no time while with him did I even observe a hate march. At no time did I observe any behavior by him that would lead a reasonable person to conclude he is an extremist, in any sane meaning of the word.

3. “and visiting anti-religious groups in Russia and Denmark.”
I have never visited an anti-religious group in Russia, Denmark or anywhere else in the world. In fact, the groups I visited in Russia and Denmark were truly religious in the most sincere sense of the word.

4. “At a meeting of hate groups in Russia, Armstrong met with deprogramming proponent Alexander Dvorkin.”
I have never attended any meeting of hate groups in Russia at any time, nor have I attended any meeting of any hate groups in any other country. I have met Dr. Dvorkin several times in Russia and in other countries, he has translated for me on several occasions, and I have been able to observe him for several hours at a time on many occasions. At no time did I observe him attend a meeting of hate groups, discuss attending any meeting of hate groups, or suggest that I or anyone else attend any meeting of hate groups. At no time did he propose deprogramming me or anyone else, as you define “deprogramming” on your hate sites; i.e., activities involving kidnapping and assaults or such stupidities. He is a Doctor of Theology, a religious man in the sincerest rational meaning of the word, and a teacher in religious studies and in religious organizations. He is one of the people identified on your hate sites as an anti-religious extremist that I know with complete certainly is not an anti-religious extremist.

5. “The following is what Gerry Armstrong’s ‘friends’ think of him:”
These people are not my ‘friends’ at all as the word ‘friends’ is commonly and sanely understood. Some of these people you call my ‘friends’ hate me almost as sociopathically as you do, and indeed serve your malevolent purposes in your Scientology v. Armstrong war. Some of these people you call my ‘friends’ and quote on your hate sites you don’t even identify by name.

You chose or invented, approved and webbed the untruthful, hateful things you say about me on your sites, and the untruthful, hateful things you claim other people say about me, whether my ‘friends’ or not. These things were written or selected to “support” your willful misidentification of me as an anti-religious extremist and your willful misassociation of me with other people you identify or misidentify as anti-religious extremists. You label, portray and position me as an anti-religious extremist so that more hate and more evil can rain down on me from everyone, and to create an atmosphere in which you can have me disposed of silently and no one would sorrow.

You write on your sites that I appear to have no gainful employment; as if this demonstrates I’m a degraded being and proves I’m the anti-religious extremist you say I am. The fact is, you and Scientology have worked very hard to prevent me from obtaining normal, gainful employment, and from living a normal, peaceful life. Your actions and threats against me and anyone who would even grant me credence , let alone gainfully employ me, have been effective. You have demonstrated that eight or ten million Scientologists, all close-knit on the one goal, can cut off many of my communications, pretty well all of my funds, and numbers of my connections, can deprive me of power, can harass me, and can impoverish me. Now you signal to those millions of your Scientology juniors all together on one goal that you can build hate sites, can lie about me, can call me an anti-religious extremist, and can legitimately attack and pursue me as an anti-religious extremist. That I am still alive, still defiant and still able to make this demand does not mean that your intentions and actions to suppress and destroy me on multiple channels are not adversely effective. I cannot but fight back. You cannot but remove all references to me from your hate sites.

Finally, you have webbed a photo of me (doing mayurasana) in multiple places on your hate sites without a proper copyright credit, and I request that you immediately correct this. I have always strived to properly indicate copyright ownership, if known to me, of any photos of you, or anyone or anything else I have used, or other materials I’ve used, in accordance with the fair use provisions of national and international copyright laws. See, e.g., the photos of you on, or linked to from, this page: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/fun/index.html

Even if you refuse to remove all your references to me from your hate sites and force me to take legal action to compel you to remove such references, this will not affect you at least providing a proper copyright ownership for my photo you are using. http://armstrong.xenu.ca/photogallery.htm

Thank you for whatever good you do.

Sincerely,
[signed]
Gerry Armstrong
Chilliwack, B.C.
Canada
gerry@gerryarmstrong.org

cc: Joel Phillips
Various Scientology organizations
Various officials
Various media and representatives
Various other individuals

by Leave a Comment

SPDL Letter to Member of Parliament Derek Lee

Member of Parliament Derek Lee
House of Commons
Room 633, Confederation Building
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Via E-Mail: Lee.D@parl.gc.ca		 November 21, 2005
Dear Mr. Lee,

I am writing to you concerning your support for the Scientology organization. I believe such support from any citizen is ill-advised, but from a Canadian Government official it is inexcusable and threatening.

Although my wife Caroline Letkeman and I have known of your involvement with Scientology for some time, it was the Ottawa Citizen article of October 26 entitled “Liberal MP stars in video promoting Scientology1 that brings me to now write you.

That article also brought us to create a web page 2assembling the documentation of your collaboration with, and hopefully soon your repudiation of, the Scientology religion and organization.

The article states, “Toronto-area MP Derek Lee appears in a recruiting video used by the Church of Scientology to attract new members in the United States.”

The article also says that you are “not particularly interested in the church’s teachings,” and that you have “done some cursory reading.” You conclude, “I’m not personally drawn to it, but I have to say that about many religious faiths.”

Most people, of course, are not personally drawn to Scientology, and would almost certainly have to say that they’re not drawn to many religious faiths. None of those people but you, however, are Canadian MPs making recruiting videos for this organization.

It is clearly irresponsible of you to volunteer or sell your name and governmental position to draw people to Scientology personally, when you are not yourself personally drawn to the organization. What you have done is like a non-smoking MP starring in a commercial to help the tobacco industry draw people personally into cigarette addiction. You would then explain that you’re not particularly drawn to smoking, but you have to say that about many addictive, costly and deadly activities.

Did you make sure you only did some cursory reading so you really did not find out what you were promoting? If you were going to star in a recruiting video for Tobaccology, would you also make sure your reading was only cursory, so that you would have that excellent justification? Or, do you really know what you’re promoting and you’re not really telling the truth about your reading’s cursoriness?

I believe that you have a responsibility to every citizen of Canada to publicly identify everything you have read of Scientology’s teachings and what you have read of all the material available on Scientology. I believe you have a responsibility to state what your understanding really is, and how exactly you came to recruit for this “religion” and organization. I also believe that you have identical responsibilities to the citizens of the U.S. at whom, according to the Ottawa Citizen article, your Scientology recruitment video is apparently aimed.

The Ottawa Citizen article does not say if Scientology paid you to star in its recruiting video, or if you volunteered for that role. Either way, however, as an employee, or agent, or volunteer for Scientology, or any of its corporations or affiliated entities, you are a “beneficiary” in a contract3 the organization seeks to enforce against me.

This contract has been the subject of several lawsuits and appellate proceedings over nineteen years.4

The purpose and effect of Scientology’s contract and its judicial enforcement, in which you are also a beneficiary, is the eradication of my basic human rights, most glaringly my right to freedom of religion. You can possibly understand how dark I might find the humor in the article’s revelation that you occasionally speak to Scientology gatherings, including one earlier this year in Toronto, as part of your “advocacy for greater religious freedom.”

The contract in fact demonstrates that Scientology and Scientologists universally are required to suppress and destroy people’s basic human rights, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, due process and freedom from slavery. As the Scientology vs. Armstrong war over twenty-four years shows, Scientologists pay great sums of money to the organization to willfully suppress and destroy these God-given and man-given rights. You are a beneficiary and participant in Scientology’s global criminal conspiracy to deprive people of those rights.

Since Scientology is a religion, which even you proclaim, silencing a person about that religion and his religious experiences in that religion is no different from, or more lawful than, silencing someone, by “contract” or otherwise, about the Christian religion and his religious experiences in the Christian religion. Or the Jewish religion, or the Buddhist religion, or the Sikh religion, or any other religion, and people’s religious experiences in those religions.

Scientology is unique among “religions” in that it contracts its adherents, and its agents like yourself, to suppress and destroy human rights. And it is the one “religion” that you made a recruitment video for as part of your advocacy for greater religious freedom. The “religious freedom” that Scientology and Scientologists seek is the religious freedom to suppress and destroy religious freedom. What Scientology is doing against me proves this fact beyond rational argument.

What Scientology, Scientologists and organization agents like yourself are doing to me also demonstrates that this religion’s own “creed”5 is a complete and cynical lie.

The Scientology vs. Armstrong litigation6 shows that all the organization’s parts, personnel and agents are contracted to violate their own religious creed. Scientology is deceitful and all of its agents, including yourself, are untrustworthy.

Only by personally repudiating organization policies and practices that violate individuals’ human rights can Scientologists possibly become worthy of trust. Only by personally repudiating these Scientology policies and practices, and personally and publicly removing yourself as a beneficiary in the Scientology vs. Armstrong contract and litigation can you begin to regain thinking people’s trust. Because of Scientology’s policy and practice of blackmailing and intimidating people, no one who speaks for this organization should ever be trusted until that policy and practice is publicly and forever stopped.

Underlying the organization’s dishonest, aggressive and criminal actions against individuals and government agencies, and underlying its determination to destroy human rights, is Scientology’s “Suppressive Person” doctrine. It is the SP doctrine that makes Scientology a hate group, and makes its victims, the “Suppressive Persons,” or “SPs,” a persecuted religious class. Even a cursory reading of the materials that comprise the SP doctrine would show that the organization is a cult, indeed a dangerous totalitarian cult.

The Ottawa Citizen article states that although you’re not particularly interested in Scientology’s teachings, you support some of the group’s programs and are particularly impressed by its Narconon and Criminon groups. These programs, however, all include indoctrination7 in Scientology’s religious, and dangerous, “Suppressive Person” doctrine.

People from these programs are being recruited to hate and attack the religious class of SPs whom organization leaders identify for hatred and attack. You also are recruiting people into Scientology for that same frightful purpose.

Scientology declared me an SP after I discovered a massive fraud in the organization and left in December 1981. Scientology’s attacks on me since then to threaten me physically, ruin me financially, crush me legally, and black PR me into oblivion constitute a modern psychoterrorism campaign.8

Scientology defrauded Caroline out of over $60,000, and declared her an SP in 2002 when she requested a refund according to Scientology’s own policy. The organization has still not refunded the money it unlawfully took from her. Scientology leaders ordered her daughter to disconnect from her, and she has had no communication from her daughter in over four years.

Scientology continues to run covert and overt operations against us9, and continues to threaten our lives and livelihoods in execution of its “Suppressive Person” doctrine.10

As individuals victimized by Scientology, as members of the Suppressive Person class, and as spokespeople for SPs and against the SP doctrine, we ask you to immediately rethink and end your support for Scientology. We ask you to publicly and completely remove yourself as a beneficiary in the Scientology vs. Armstrong contract and legal case. We also ask that you shift your support from Scientology to its SP victims.

Please feel free to contact me at any time.

Yours sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
[previous address]
gerry@gerryarmstrong.org

cc: Right Hon. Paul Martin
cc: Hon. Irwin Cotler
cc: Members of Parliament
cc: Canadian media
cc: alt.religion.scientology

Notes

by Leave a Comment

OSA Int ED: Squirrels

E  X  E  C  U  T   I  V  E     D  I   R  E  C  T  I  V  E

OSA INT ED 19

20 September 19841

ALL SCIENTOLOGISTS
PUBLIC NOTICE BOARD
STAFF NOTICE BOARD

SQUIRRELS

The following people have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted with the religion of Scientology or Scientologists. Their actions are destructive and aimed at the enslavement rather than the freedom of man.

Dede Voegeding
Kima Douglas
Gerry Armstrong2
John Nelson
Laurel Sullivan
David Mayo

The above named squirrels have attempted to taint government with their false reports.

They have deliberately held policy up to scorn and altered such policies to suit their own destructive end.

Some of these squirrels have offered false testimony to the IRS in order to protect their overts against mankind and their only road out of this universe.

Several of them have misrepresented Scientology practices to the FBI or Justice Department in a futile attempt to taint the minds of the government and the courts against the Church of Scientology.

They have supported psychiatric aims and principles over Scientology principles in their misrepresentations to Department of Justice representatives as well as Boston lawyer Michael Flynn.

They have turned from ethical and moral Scientology principles by demanding no ethics be applied to them or by them.

Several of them have spoken out against Scientologists in good standing to the IRS in a hope that they might escape from their own destructive acts and shift attention from themselves and their crimes.

They have altered and assisted in the alteration of Tech in an attempt to seal off the bridge to those who have fallen prey to their destructive intentions.

Their continual harmful acts to themselves and their continued desire to drag others to the level of beasts and animals devoid of spiritual qualities places them in the psychiatric camp of those who manufacture madness for profit.

Therefore, be it known that these acts of spiritual destruction and cries for no ethics, no morals, and no policy, have separated them from the body of the ethical and practicing Scientologists of this planet.

-2-

     Dedicated Scientologists need not support them until they have fully recanted and fully fulfilled all of the requirements of the Ethics and Justice PLs dealing with suppressives and suppressive acts.

This ED is written that those who are not informed as to the acts of those named above may now be so informed.

It is written so that those who are not Scientologists may be warned that these individuals do not represent the Church or the religion of Scientology in any capacity.

Their only terminal is the International Justice Chief.

CO OSA INT

Authorized by
AVC INT

for the
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

CSI:AVCI:COOSAI:ts
(c) 1984 CSI
All Right Reserved

Notes

  1. Document in PDF format. ↩
  2. See Gerry’s Notes on OSA Int ED 19 Squirrels. ↩

by Leave a Comment

Incidents of following/harassment Sunday September 19, 1982

pi-thugs-19a
September 19, 1982. Photo of the Camaro in the chiropractic clinic parking lot adjacent to my home. Driving the car is the man who pushed me around on August 29, and in the passenger seat is the man who had been driving the Cadillac. The photo was taken from my property across my fence.
pi-thugs-19b
September 19, 1982. Photo taken from the same place as the previous one, of the Camaro still in the parking lot.
pi-thugs-20a
September 19, 1982. Photo taken from the same place in my yard. Here the driver of the Camaro has spotted me and is driving out of the parking lot.
pi-thugs-20b
September 19, 1982. Photo of the Camaro leaving the chiropractic clinic parking lot. The man in the passenger seat is looking back at me while I take his photograph from my yard.
pi-thugs-21
September 19, 1982. Photo of Camaro taken a short time later after leaving from and returning to the chiropractic clinic parking lot. The car was driven very close to the fence between my yard and the parking lot, and both men peered between the boards of the fence at my car and trailer.

The following continued through this day. The cars in use were the Camaro and the Cadillac. Drivers were Cad and the Pusher.In the early afternoon Camaro drove into the chiropractor parking lot adjacent to my wife’s and my trailer. In the car were Pusher driving and Cad in the passenger seat.They drove up close to the fence and peered through cracks in it. I got my camera and took several photos of the Camaro in the parking lot.

Following continued into the night.

by Leave a Comment

Armstrong’s Reports of Harassment by Scientology’s PI Thugs

See report of August 29, 1982
See report of August 29, 1982

Report concerning being tailed by yellow Volkswagen on August 18, 1982

Statement concerning confrontation with person staking out my home on August 20, 1982

Report concerning incident of being followed and staked out on Sunday, August 29, 1982

Report concerning incident of following/harassment on Tuesday, August 31, 1982

Report concerning incidents of following/harassment on Wednesday, September 1, 1982

Report concerning incidents of being followed/harassed on Thursday, September 2, 1982

Report concerning incidents of being followed/harassed on Friday, September 3, 1982

Report concerning incidents of following/harassment Saturday, September 4, 1982

Report concerning incidents of following/harassment Monday, September 6, 1982

Report concerning incidents of following/harassment Saturday, September 11, 1982

Report concerning incidents of following/harassment Sunday, September 12, 1982

Incidents of following/harassment Friday, September 17, 1982

Incidents of following/harassment Saturday, September 18, 1982

Incidents of following/harassment Sunday September 19, 1982

by Leave a Comment

Incidents of following/harassment Saturday, September 18, 1982

pi-thugs-18b
September 18, 1982. Photo of the Cadillac, license #082 XQV, parked a short distance from my home. The driver was not present at the time I took this shot.

The following began first thing in the morning and continued throughout the day. Wherever my wife and I went one of the followers, either Cad in the Cadillac or Gregory Osbourne in the Camaro was there: shopping, shoe repair shop, post office, car repair shop.

At one point my wife and I pulled into the shoe repair shop. The Cadillac pulled a U-turn in the middle of the street to follow us. The driver, Cad, was ticketed by an officer Cisneros of the Costa Mesa police.

This was the second time one of my followers was stopped or ticketed by the police and only one of many traffic violations. I explained this to Officer Cisneros, and also informed him about the harassment that was going on with the people paid by Scientology.

Also that day I spoke with Gregory Osbourne in order to get his agreement not to come onto the trailer park property because it upset the residents. During our conversation he said that when he was briefed for the job of following me that he had been told that I was involved in criminal activity and that I could be going to jail. He was also briefed that I was part of a large group who were involved in the theft of documents and he was to watch for anyone else I met. These “facts” he was briefed on are false and are simply another evidence of harassment and Fair Game Doctrine by Scientology.

The rest of the day my wife and I were followed wherever we went by either the Camaro or the Cadillac. Driving at different times were Cad, Gregory Osbourne or “Pusher.”