Suppressive Person Defense League

You are here: Home / Archives for legal

legal

by

OSA NWO: The Effects Of Drugs On Jurisprudence: LSD, Peyote, Hashish, Marijuana, Etc.

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

4 April 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1191

OSA Int/Conts
Execs
Legal Staff

THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON JURISPRUDENCE: LSD, PEYOTE, HASHISH, MARIJUANA, ETC.
(Taken from LRH notes.)

References:
HCOB 28 Aug. 68 DRUGS
HCOB 29 Aug. 68 DRUG DATA
HCOB 8 Jan. 69 DRUGS AND “INSANITY” NON-COMPLIANCE AND ALTER-IS
HCOB 31 May 77 LSD, YEARS AFTER THEY HAVE “COME OFF OF” LSD

No court evidence of a druggie is worth anything. Yet the FBI counts on it wholly.

Psychopathic liars may be just delusory cases or drug addicts or one time druggies.

The reference is the book Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health on the subject of “dub-in,”2 only the dub-in is in present time also.

Jurisprudence is even more tipped in favor of the scoundrel or the insane.

Nobody is safe from their hallucinatory suits, false witness, etc. They actually think various things happened when they didn’t.

The conclusion is that no person who is on drugs or is an uncured addict should be allowed to testify.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩
  2. Definition: Dub-in ↩

by

OSA NWO: Anti-Religious Movement

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

4 April 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1161

OSA Int/Conts
All Execs & Staff

ANTI-RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT
(Originally written by LRH circa December 1978.)

I got the book Cointelpro, The FBI’s Secret War On Political Freedom (edited by Cathy Perkus, Monad Press, New York), and was suddenly struck by the way the Anti-Religious Movement would fit into the FBI-CIA modus operandi.

Members of ARM—hardware merchant types—are the kind of persons who would believe it was patriotic to cooperate with the establishment.

I imagine parents’ groups would have some sort of a contact.

The establishment uses psychiatrists in IRS actions and seems to use psychiatrists in other ways.

So people like Sargant probably have their connections with the FBI and CIA (I think of no better way to ruin psychiatry than to expose that it was secretly an agent of the establishment). Psychiatrists are on these parents’ groups.

What you’re looking at is a group vs. group think as described in the book Cointelpro.

Their whole house of cards will collapse if by deposition and interrogatories in any suit or legal proceeding it could be established that the FBI-CIA were the actual organizers and even funders of such groups.

We know the CIA actively funded and ran student groups to oppose anti-war groups.

I also think you will find that most of your opponents overseas are directly connected with the establishment in the US. Now that the operations board has been isolated it should be easy to spot their outer connections and run them back and expose them.

I think you should make it a solid rule that in every trial or court action you use interrogatories and depositions which bluntly demand connections with the FBI, CIA, IRS, on a paid or volunteer basis. If you do this, just as a routine activity, it will turn up evidence which can then be used not only in suits against the government, but also in severely amputating the dangers and destructive power of the FBI and CIA.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩

by

OSA NWO: Types of Charges

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

1 March 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1321

OSA Int/Conts
Execs
Production Bureaux Staff

IMPORTANT
TYPES OF CHARGES
(Originally an LRH despatch, written on 12 September 1973.)

When people have been put in fear of their lives, when they have lost their property, when they have for years suffered infamy “leaked” to the press from knowingly and maliciously internationally circulated false police records, words like “libel” and other civil law matters are very pale words indeed.

CONSPIRACY is the basic charge most in vogue today by police. It is CONSPIRACY to circulate false police records and send them across borders and secretly show them to judges.

A self-interest group introduced those false reports or the idea of making them to the police. By pulling strings we can tie this in.

Despite the renowned and honored opinion of a UK law firm, it is quite correct by common law that a criminal act can become the basis of a civil proceeding. If a woman’s husband, who is her means of support, is murdered one can civilly sue on her behalf to recover damages for the criminal action. This may have fallen out of use and law students dozing over their books may have missed the fact that this was once legal, has not been legislated against and at the worst has only fallen out of use.

In primitive tribes criminal acts are usually the subject of civil damages to the offended or wronged or injured party. The courts of Greece, on which all modern law, including Roman law, was founded SETTLED MURDER IN NO OTHER WAY in the majority of its suits.

CONSPIRACY to damage or wrong is the modern bridge between civil and criminal law. It is a criminal act which is civilly actionable. Correspondence alone, not only a physical meeting, can discuss an act and thus make a conspiracy. In those few places which debar this it is possible to prove meetings in the flesh. The FBI I think uses correspondence and phone calls to establish it.

YOU MUST HAVE A CHARGE AND DIRECTION WHICH PAVES THE WAY TO THE EVENTUAL SNOW WHITE GENOCIDE TARGETS BY OBTAINING DATA THAT THERE WAS A PLAN AND PLOT TO DESTROY A RELIGION.

There are other charges than over-used “libel.”

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩

by

OSA NWO: German Case

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

29 February 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1311

OSA Int/Conts
Execs
Production Bureaux Staff

Confidential
GERMAN CASE
(Originally written by LRH on 30 August 1973, concerning a suit against the German police for spreading false reports.)

I have no need to stress that this is a terribly important case. Underneath the surface for two decades police and Interpol have been used to spread false and damaging data to the press and governments. This line has been the cause of enormous losses and much labor.

We now have the opportunity to reverse the entire trend of events to such a degree that this could be the last battle of the war.

The strategy I advised had apparently worked: we can now sue the magazine independently, mop up the ground with them and then use them to attack the police in Germany.

The real target is Interpol.

The mechanism of subpoenaing papers, witnesses and depositions can now begin. If this is correctly conducted it will go like an ethics investigation of pulling strings. The suit then has two objectives, 1) to win an actual cash settlement and 2) to run to earth every contrary criminal conspiracy that has been at work for more than two decades.

If you did not go in for “damage to reputation” and used some other charge like placing in fear and jeopardy by falsifying records and publicizing false records as I advised your own defense will be minimal and your attack line maximal. I hope my “Suit Caution” arrived in time and was heeded.

Cleverly fought, evidence for a hundred suits in a dozen countries can be gathered in this German police suit. This is the lever that moves the world. Every enemy can be made to stand and deliver.

Any suit you now start can of course be cross-played in what you find about this German suit. Evidence in one area can be used in another and so forth.

Anyone handling this should be familiar with investigatory tech where you pull a string that leads to another string on and on until you find a General Sherman tank. Unless you sued on damage to repute, your opportunity for PR is endless. And so is your string pulling. Done correctly, the head of the German justice system will resign, the Home Secretary and head of Scotland Yard will also, the FBI and Justice and Treasury principals may very well pack up and Interpol will either fold or drastically reform. All these and other actions lie directly in your power. Ethics is going in on governments, look at Watergate. You are in the trend of the times and should make the most of it.

The enemy has made a colossal blunder, one of the kind that attorneys pray for. Not only were false reports being made but also illegally publicized. This is the sort of case that comes once in a lifetime.

Only some equally large technical blunder on our parts could lose it. Thus legal tech must be impeccable, no errors, no faults.

The sources of all their reports can be depositioned in addition to the records.

And when depositioned, if one can get names of where THEY got it, that can be set up for new deposition. And every deposition becomes bait for a perjury charge or damages and every evidence gained in A can be used in B. You will be able to run these attacks down to the “seventh generation” back.

Subpoena the record. “Where did you get these parts F, K, P and L?” By legal means pull F, K, P and L into it. “Where did you get that data?” And F, K, P and L give you G, R and J. “Where did you get that data?”

This will work because every one of these poor sods will plead they were innocent by quoting the “authority” from which they got their data. You get the “authority” in each case and lay grounds for new suits. It didn’t make anyone innocent, the data is false, so they are guilty. But each one will use that plea. So use the plea to get someone else onto the hot seat.

There will be an effort to prove their good faith by claiming that something dimly that way (like the charge) was true. You use this to prove the charge they did publish was false; I am sure they will not be able to resist this temptation, to claim only slight error; but the moment they claim ANY error they have pleaded guilty to issuing a false charge.

I trust you were able to sue for a billion. This in itself is PR, but factually these charges have caused far more loss than that over the decades.

You are not going to settle for less. You want this case to continue as long as you can bleed it for more cases. Ultimately you will be forced to accept a victory and payoff; by that time you will have the material for more and more cases, each one proven won by the fact that the last one before it won.

Your real target is Interpol. They are the pipeline. They have violated their charter. You can demand its cancellation as a conspiracy against all honest citizens. You will find that people will spook when it is asserted that THEY are on Interpol records with false charges too. Public opinion against secret police and violent police is being heeded: the “no-knock raiders” who were marshals breaking into US homes at first were just shrugged off by the Justice Department: this suddenly changed and a dozen of these marshalls have now been indicted. Governments are afraid of public reaction, they believe what they read in the press; you must make successful press out of this. Try them in the press. That’s why you must have PR firms.

Interpol offices have been releasing material unbeknownst to us all over the world. Who got them to do it? And who got THEM to do it?

You will be pulling the German Interpol office into this almost at once. This office as itself, not as Interpol, can be sued elsewhere. And main Interpol can be sued and its offices in any country.

You are not pressed for funds. They are at your disposal from any funds. Further, you can get subscriptions from members all over the world when you tell them this was what made it hard on all of us and that it is being remedied.

Various media will get pulled into it. ITV was there somewhere on that info handout line which undid any good we did. Their interviewers were sitting sniggering believing themselves safely holding true police reports. Cleverness will count in finding someone admitting they gave out these reports. And there goes ITV. And BBC. You see how the media chain can go.

That is why I was working on the central idea. It is best to estimate which way it went. Well you know of one direction per files and we are getting another. Scandal will be pulled into this to make press like 6 1/2 million dead Jews. The story will be that they were afraid of us because we knew who really did it and they have fought like trapped rats to prevent their exposure.

So out of this beginning you are going to complete the already begun reversal of the trend of the last few years. You are on the upswing already. This is going to send you zooming. This is going to turn it from a sneering “those” to “YES sir” to a member of the group.

It is axiomatic that he who tames a lion is now the lion tamer. Primitive man, which is to say modern man, turns to the victors.

So this one we win. No matter what skill, exactitude, cleverness or boldness that is required, whatever funds are needed, this one we win. For if we win it in all its main battles and outflung skirmishes, we will have won the world, certainly for our field. We have never had any real opponents technically or ethically. Now we will have a long hard-fought battle and we will have no opponents at all.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩

by

OSA NWO: Suit Caution

OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS

28 February 1988

OSA Network Order No. 1301

OSA Int/Conts
Execs
Production Bureaux Staff

Confidential
SUIT CAUTION
(Originally written on 23 August 1973, concerning the legal actions taken against government and police agencies to handle the origination and dissemination of false reports by these agencies.)

The exact charge must be presented in writs.

Attorneys often like to add in automatically “defamation of character and damage therefore.” If you let this into suits the governments will use it as an opportunity to try the plaintiff (precedent is our World Federation of Mental Health defense in England where we made them prove, which they could not, that they had any character to defame). If this is entered in writs, particularly in US, then the government can rake over any old imagined scandal and even though these can be handled, they would make bad press. This would extend the issue and cost as well.

The clear cut charge is simply issuing false reports and using these to instigate the destruction of an individual and Church by illegal means resulting in placing people in fear and damaging their lives.

This can be prosecuted by the plaintiff in a clear cut fashion and all efforts of the police attorneys to put the case over into “they didn’t have any character and should have been shot” will be ruled extraneous. Keeping it on a civil rights, ethical police, no end justifies such means will become then something a judge can find them guilty of and on which he can award damages.

Further, that Interpol was falsely attacking a Church contrary to its charter becomes evident only if the reports are shown to be false.

Further, when the charge in a writ is made that way, ANY effort of the police attorney will prove the charge as they CONTINUE to falsely attack even in the court.

All they have to be steered into is to admit that “yes, it wasn’t worded right, the actual facts are slightly different but they are still bad people” and you have won your case as they have admitted the charges and record were false. Thus strategy would be to lead them to say it was different than the police said and promptly file for an award in our favor.

In other words, the moment you also charge with libel, slander, defamation, you make the police attorneys capable of jeopardizing your win for they will then call up all sorts of odd ball witnesses and psychiatrists and “damaged” people to try you instead of them and could influence the judge, even if we proved them wrong, into finding “for the public protection” and ruling that it was okay for police to lie.

Thus, quickly inspect any already issued writs and review any planning and BE VERY CAREFUL OF THIS POINT IN THE FUTURE.

It is possible our attorneys have already handled this. But you cannot count upon that.

KEEP THE DOOR CLOSED TO ANY AVENUE WHICH SEEKS TO LET THE GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS JUSTIFY THEIR MEANS. USE ANY EQUIVOCATION ON THE PART OF THE POLICE TO PROVE THAT THEY LIED AND ARE STILL LYING.

In that way only, these suits are a piece of religion. Given technical legal accuracy (a case can be lost by some minor technical point such as misfiling) you have an ironbound case that would be very hard to lose.

Oh, yes: All the police have to say is “that we trusted our brothers in blue overseas” and you have also won at once.

On YOUR side you can reinforce your case if you get busy enough by finding others who have been falsely reported on such as people falsely arrested by the same police. These are easy to locate, just by court records. You don’t want a Class Suit, all you want is to show that the police are thoroughgoing bad hats without any restraint or honesty and precipitate for them wholesale political questioning, enquiries into them, resignations of their chiefs, etc. Make THIS sort of thing make the headlines.

You REALLY NEED A PRO man alongside of each of these suits, not just an attorney. You can retain PRO firms. You should do so to handle press and guide it to an overhaul of police.

As to Interpol, do NOT forget this point: They are a Kingdom of the Cops, a law unto themselves. Their actions are never overseen as there is no court or government above them. Examining them reveals a complete Fascism from which there is no appeal. They should be hit along these lines and revealed as a Fascist state all by their little selves that is mauling the planet. They were born as an independent kingdom of the cops and have been just that ever since. They are secret, they know no boundaries. They seek to build up their necessity but they violate the sovereign duties of every government and the sovereignty of every citizen. And they have NOT reduced crime, it has INCREASED since they came into existence. They must be portrayed as a force without check which has proven completely unsuccessful in preventing international crime. They never made the slightest dent in plane hijacking.

All any future ruler of the world would have to do is to take over Interpol and he would have it made at once. There are more arguments for charter abolition than merely their religion violation. They are an affront to all decent men and the good they do does not begin to outweigh the sorrow and anguish they cause. They are a Hitlerian secret police system of which the public is unaware and should be abolished for the good of Man.

Remember these points. They are important.

And it’s an order to get a PRO person or wog firm to parallel each of these suits with the objective of bringing about a political reform, defense of individual liberty and securing individual privacy with freedom from corrupt or dishonest police.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes

  1. This document in PDF format. ↩

by Leave a Comment

HCOPL: Misrepresentation of Dianetics and Scientology

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 29 SEPTEMBER 19821

Remimeo

Keeping Scientology Working Series 30

MISREPRESENTATION OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY

There is a vital legal and PR point which should be broadly known.

“Standard Tech” is contained in the official volumes of the technical services and in HCO Bulletins and charts within them and in textbooks on the subject.

These are, none of them, vague. They are very explicit.

The data is thus not only available but taught in courses.

Now and then we hear of “somebody’s case messed up.” Or that someone was complaining or dissatisfied with results. Research into such cases uniformly shows that STANDARD TECH was not applied.

Thus one arrives at an interesting point: Standard tech has never harmed anybody.

Recently there was a spate of “out-tech” on some executives that “messed up their cases.” (This of course impaired their effectiveness and made them feel”Dianetics and Scientology did not work and so was not worth defending.”)

A careful review of these cases showed that the “Case Supervisor” and a small clique of “auditors” (all of whom knew better but who were serving their own ends) were NOT applying Dianetics and Scientology but were only pretending to. (The clique has been detected and thoroughly handled and so are the”messed-up cases” -by standard tech of course and so successfully.)

But this brings up an interesting and useful legal and public relations point:

When people complain and are “dissatisfied with results,” it will be found that Dianetics and Scientology were NOT being used on them.

Someone was doing something else and calling it Dianetics and Scientology.

This is, of course, misrepresentation and a violation of trademark and copyright law.

A similar circumstance would occur if someone put transmission oil in a package marked “Green Meadow Butter” and sold it and advised its use as”Green Meadow Butter” when it isn’t.

Legal and PR situations from people who have complaints stem from two reasons:

A. They are themselves engaged for whatever reason in some self-serving end by complaining or

B. They did not receive Dianetics and Scientology.

A review of any such cases will bear this out. It is not a matter of making minor errors with the tech. It is not a matter of poor C/S judgment in applying it. The situation will be found to be flagrant.

Someone was only pretending it was Dianetics and Scientology and doing something else and for some other reason.

Here we have a problem in labels. The labels “Dianetics” and “Scientology”could illegally be placed on anything and that anything might be quite bad.

Thus it is the person misrepresenting who is actionable, not the originator or the properly licensed and supervised entities.

The operating question is “What did he or they do that they were calling Dianetics and Scientology standard tech?” And “Let me have their names so the misrepresentation can be stopped.”

Don’t let yourself be conned by an old legal or PR trick of switching labels!

Dianetics and Scientology are a precise system that works.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Notes