FLAG ORDER 3434RE-27R
All SO ORGS AND UNITS
RPFs
SENIOR QUALS8 May 19971
Rev. 8 May 2003For Pilot Only
RPF Series 27R
THE RPF TECHNICAL PROGRAM
References:
HCOB 20 June 71 C/S Series 47 THE SUPREME TEST OF A C/SF0 3434RE-2 RPF Series 2 RPF TARGET
This is the Rehabilitation Project Force Technical Program. It has been written in strict accordance with the LRH references on tech handlings for the RPF.
The RPF provides the means by which those who have been destructive on post can fully redeem themselves, thus regain their self-esteem as productive and contributing Sea Org members, this technical program has been compiled to facilitate exactly that.
Upon transfer to the RPF, one handles at once any ethics or PTS conditions and then his program is directed toward co-auditing where he receives a full cleanup of overts, withholds and evil purposes which underlie such poor conduct, all to be done while the person contributes on deck work so as not to go further out-exchange with the group.
Each person in the RPF is programmed strictly against this issue and in full alignment with the C/S Series.
The steps of this technical program are also laid out in a checklist attached to this issue. This checklist is placed in front of the RPF member’s case folder so that the co-auditor and C/S can sign off and attest that each step has been completed.
The RPF member’s training is programmed against the basic lineup of actions listed below under “AUDITING.” This consists of getting through his conditions and then rapidly studying and drilling what he is going to audit, on a “read it, drill it, do it” basis. The RPF member does the specific “read it, do it, drill it” for the immediate auditing actions that his twin is to receive, and then audits his twin on that.
For further auditing actions required by the RPF member’s twin, the RPF member would train on the corresponding “read it, drill it, do it” for that action.
Such training allows RPF members to rapidly co-audit their way to redemption.
ETHICS
0. INTRODUCTORY STEP
As the first step upon entering the RPF, the person reads all RPF Series Flag Orders to gain a full understanding of the purpose, rules and regulations of the RPF program. He then executes certain waivers to attest that he wants to do the RPF program, understands the discipline required and is participating on his own volition.
1. CONDITIONAL: PTS HANDLING
If PTS the situation gets fully handled. This is to be done exactly per HCOB 31 Dec 1978RB OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING. The person is not to be put on any study actions or auditing actions other than those which handle PTSness, until such time as the PTS situation is handled.
Unpublished work: © created 1997 revised 2003 CSI.
All Rights Reserved.FLAG ORDER 3434RE-27R
-2-
2. ETHICS CONDITIONS
Ethics conditions are done up to Liability in relation to the overall activity from which the person was assigned to the RPF. The RPF members should work through these conditions., studying any applicable ethics references as needed in order to achieve a full result. While in the RPF, he would of course apply the full array of conditions formulas based on his stats and production. (Ref: HCO PL 12 July 1980R, THE BASICS OF ETHICS)
AUDITING
1. CONDITIONAL: AUDITED PTS HANDLINGS
If PTS, any audited actions needed to handle PTSness must be done. (To be determine by the C/S.)
This step is vital and must not be skimped or glossed over on any RPF member. (Ref: HCOB 31 Dec 1978RB II, OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING) Note: A case which needs a full PTS Rundown is programmed according to HCOB 9 Dec 1971RE, PTS RUNDOWN, AUDITED.
2. CONDITIONAL: DRUG HANDLING
For those with a heavy drug history, it may be necessary to run or flatten a drug handling action before proceeding with the False Purpose Rundown. Drugs impair a person’s ability to confront his case, and persons who have been on drugs do not make case gain until the drugs are handled. (To be determined by the C/S.) (Refs: HCOB 31 March 1981R, “HEAVY DRUG HISTORY” DEFINED and HCOB 11 June 1984, C/Sing THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN)
3. FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN AUDITING
A) C/S PREPARED FPRD FORM ON THE SUBJECT OR AREA OF THE PERSON’S ASSIGNMENT TO THE RPF OR THE APPLICABLE FPRD FORM.
Includes direct evil purpose questions as well as overt questions to address the reason the person was RPFed.
For example, a Sea Org member who was assigned to the RPF for destructive actions as a cook is to be programmed to receive an FPRD form written expressly to address that area.
B) CONDITIONAL: TRUTH RUNDOWN
If it is found that the RPF member has any involvement in spreading black PR, he receives the Truth Rundown.
The Truth Rundown utilizes the precise technology of the False Purpose Rundown to get the underlying causes of why individuals originate or pick up and spread black PR. It is invaluable in handling individuals who have spread destructive black PR—and those who themselves originated the black PR—about their own group or its leaders, activities, products or purposes.
Any and all points of black PR that were reportedly originated or spread by the individual are taken up and run. The Truth Rundown Confessional is also done, as needed, per its instructions. (Ref: HCOB 13 Oct 91R I, Truth Rundown Series 1R, THE TRUTH RUNDOWN)
C) FIRST DYNAMIC FPRD
D) SECOND DYNAMIC FPRD
E) THIRD DYNAMIC FPRD
F) FOURTH DYNAMIC FPRD
G) FIFTH DYNAMIC FPRD
H) SIXTH DYNAMIC FPRD
I) SEVENTH DYNAMIC FPRD
-3-
FLAG ORDER 3434RE-27R
J) EIGHTH DYNAMIC FPRD
K) CONDITIONAL: IF NEEDED ADDITIONAL FORMS OR TAILORED SEC CHECK QUESTIONS TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EP OF THE RPF PROGRAM.
The FPRD Basic Form is not directed for use on the RPF program as it does not cover a specific dynamic but is a general form.
4. CONDITIONAL: EXPANDED DIANETICS
Full use of Expanded Dianetics is required if the RPF member is below Clear, is R/Sing and is dramatizing the R/Ses.
This means:
Setups—per HCOB 23 April 1974RA EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES,
OCA left-hand side handling,
OCA right-hand side handling.
In other words,
“a thorough, workmanlike handling of the pc’s aberrations and contrasurvival intentions, in all aspects handling of the pc’s aberrations and contrasurvival intentions, in all aspects of life and livingness, that truly accomplishes changes for the better in the behavior, outlook, social presence and conduct of the preclear.”—LRH (Ref: HCOB 1 May 1991 XIX, Expanded Dianetics Series 39, C/Sing AND PROGRAMING EXPANDED DIANETICS)
5. CONDITIONAL: Audited NOTs R/S handling
“If a pre-OT staff member is R/Sing and dramatizing the R/Ses and has therefore been put on an RPF, he is required to receive full handling per the special NED Rundown for OTs before graduating that RPF. If he is Clear but not yet OT III, he is to get up to and through OT III as fast as possible so he can receive this special rundown.”—LRH (Ref: HCOB 13 Sept 78II, CLEARS, OTs AND R/Ses)
6. RPF FINAL ASSESSMENT2
With all previous steps of the RPF technical program completed, a final assessment is done to ensure nothing was missed.
The assessment is issued in a separate directive to RPFs. Any reads are taken up and handled at once and the list is reassessed until there are no reads.
This assessment is to be recorded on videotape clearly showing the meter and pc and is sent with the RPF member’s graduation CSW.
7. CONDITIONAL: RE-EDUCATION STEP FOR LIST ONE R/Sers
FO 3434RE-15 RPF Series 15, RE-EDUCATION STEP gives an additional handling for persons coming out of the RPF who were List One R/Sers:
a. A TRs course, such as the Success Through Communication Course
b. A full PR course, such as the PR Series Course
c. The Personal Grooming Course
d. The Sea Org Etiquette Course
e. Read the book How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie3, and do practical exercises on this.
f. Auditing on times he was a nice guy and was successful at it, as follows: Recall a time you were a nice guy and were successful at it.: To F/N, cognition, VGIs, release.
FLAG ORDER 3434RE-27R
-4-
COMPLETING LIABILITY
It is vital that an RPF member fully completes the formula for the condition of Liability. The work one does in the RPF, such as on the decks, is his production in exchange for what he receives by way of the delivery of the RPF technical program, his food, lodging, etc. It does not complete step 3 of the Liability formula with the org or group he was in prior to the RPF. Therefore, once the RPFer has successfully completed all technical and deck production requirements in the RPF and steps 1 and 2 of the Liability formula, and has received approval to graduate, he is to report to Department 3 of his org where he is to complete his Liability formula.
Only when upgraded to Non-Existence is he a full graduate of the RPF and eligible for posting, full allowance and regular crew study time. By the time the RPF graduate has completed his liability formula in full, HCO is to already have a posting order approved so there is no delay in being routed onto post as a crew member in a condition of Non-Existence.
C/S RESPONSIBILITIES
No attempt has been made here to list any vital repair actions needed by a case to do the steps of this technical program, as these are fully covered in the C/S Series HCOBs and in the course materials for Class V Graduate Auditor and C/S.
The stress is on getting each RPF member through these basic steps as listed in this issue rapidly and thoroughly, and not off onto other actions such as “he must complete the course he was in the middle of when he was assigned to the RPF.”
Although the steps in this technical program are generally done in the order listed above, it may not be used to robotically program the order in which the technical program steps are done on a case. For instance, an RPF member who has both a PTS situation and a very serious situation of unhandled drugs might require a different sequence of the steps of this program than a PTS RPF member who already has his drugs fully handled. The C/S Series must be followed in all cases.
The RPF C/S must bear in mind the purpose of the RPF, and not order unnecessary rundowns or major actions or repairs. One programs an RPF member’s case against this technical program and follows HCOB 20 June 1971, C/S Series 47, THE SUPREME TEST OF A C/S.
“The Supreme Test of an auditor or a C/S is to make auditing go right—by the book.”—LRH
SNR C/S INTERNATIONAL
Authorized by AVC INTERNATIONAL
for CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
CSI:FT:RM:ab
List One R/Ser
HCOB: Rock Slams and Rock Slammers
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICESaint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, SussexHCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1974RA
REVISED 5 SEPTEMBER 1978Remimeo
Expanded Dianetics Specialists
Cl IVs and Above
C/Ses
Qual
HCO Dept 3 Hats
PTS/SP Detection CourseROCK SLAMS AND ROCK SLAMMERS
R/Ses
An R/S or rock slam is defined as the crazy, irregular, left-right slashing motion of the needle on the E-Meter dial. R/Ses repeat left and right slashes unevenly and savagely, faster than the eye easily follows. The needle is frantic. The width of an R/S depends largely on sensitivity setting. It goes from one-fourth inch to whole dial. But it slams back and forth. It is actually quite startling to see. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER METER PHENOMENA.
[…]
ROCK SLAMMERS
In a normal group of 400, the actual percentage of R/Sers is low. It’s about 8 in 400, or 2-2 ½ percent. Those figures should seem familiar. They are the same percentage for SPs. And that gives you a clue to the identification of an R/Ser.
Where requirements for Scientology or SO orgs have been established for R/Ses, they apply to the 2-2 ½ percent of real R/Sers as these are high risks for staff purposes.
These people can of course be salvaged as pcs using Expanded Dianetics. Letting them on staff could be disasterous, however.
A handled R/Ser can be expected to eventually wind up in the same category as a cleared cannibal. His experiential track is too educated in evil and too uneducated in anything else. So even when cleaned up will need a lot of living.
R/Sers are also very expensive people to keep around. They waste the available resources and produce overt products. They cost a fortune in waste, repairs, lost business. They also cost a heartbreaking number of damaged people.
[…]
LIST ONE R/Ser
There are, for our purposes, two kinds of R/Sers. (a) Those who R/S on subjects not connected with Scientology and (b) those who R/S on subjects connected to Scientology. The latter is a “List One R/Ser” and it is of great importance to us that they be located and moved off lines when they are part of staffs as their intent is solely to destroy us whatever else they say: Their long-run actions will prove it.
The definition of a List One R/Ser is anyone who has R/Sed on List One1
[…]
Where there is any doubt as to the validity of a List One R/S, a verification should be done. The procedure is to vigorously sec check the pc on the subject of the reported List One R/S. This Sec Check must be done by an auditor who knows R/Ses and can make lists read and pull W/Hs connected with R/S.
[…]
Where a pc R/Ses, he will have evil purposes and be on a succumb as a result. R/Ses indicate an area of psychosis which will ruin the pc’s life if allowed to go unhandled.
[…]
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Hubbard, L. R. (1974, 1 November). Rock Slams and Rock Slammers (Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin). The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Vol. X, pp. 656-659). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.
Notes
Flag Order: Re-Education Step
SEA ORGANIZATION
FLAG ORDER 3434RE-15
23 February 19781
All SO Orgs and Units
RPFs
Senior QualsRPF Series 15
RE-EDUCATION STEP
(Taken from an LRH advice of 23 February 1978 where LRH is commenting on the posting of a List One R/Ser to an executive post, issued as a Flag Order on 8 May 1997.)
The thing people don’t realize about List One R/Sers is that when they’re cleaned up you have somebody whose track training and experience is all involved with overts. He has little or no experience being a good guy. In essence, this is the same problem one would have with a cleared cannibal. A cleared cannibal is a cleared cannibal.
In this particular case, I have no doubt that his List One R/Ses are cleared up, but his education, which is to say, experienced background for billions of years, contains only chopping people up with bad TRs. He simply doesn’t know how to talk to a person without invalidating him as that’s the only way he knows how to talk to anybody.
The advantage is that he is now open to new training which he never was before. He would have to be put through TRs—which he never could have passed before—taught social graces such as saying please and thank you, and opening the door for somebody.
So the probability is that it is a cruelty to clean up a List One R/Ser and then not give him a full PR course, a course in grooming, etiquette and some books to read about nice guys.
The advantage is he is now not plotting one or another’s demise covertly and is not fixedly preventing himself from learning anything.
One would have him read for sure and do some practical on How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie. That is the only book I know of that will do him some good.
We will decannibalize the cleared cannibal.
One could even go further with auditing and find some times, if they are there, when he was a nice guy and was successful at it.
I’m writing this so you will understand why it isn’t okay to appoint an ex-L1 R/Ser.
L. RON HUBBARD
COMMODORECompilation assisted by LRH Technical Research and Compilations
LRH:RTRC:ed
Unpublished Work: © created 1978 L. Ron Hubbard Library
All Rights Reserved.
Notes
HCOB: Routine 2-12 List One — The Scientology List
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, SussexHCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1962Central Orgs
MissionsROUTINE 2-12
LIST ONE — ISSUE ONE
THE SCIENTOLOGY LISTThis is the List One of Routine 2-12. You can lengthen but do not shorten this list for Step 1 of R2-12.
This list is used over and over on all 12 Steps until no reaction of any kind can be gotten off of it. If an item on it reads sporadically, even, use it on the 12 Steps.
The Scientology List is called LIST ONE. Others, 1A, 1B, are called by their designations. All lists, including the Scientology List, are referred to in general as “A first list”, or “The first list”.
_____________________________________
PC NAME_____________________________________
DATE_____________________________________
AUDITOR_____________________________________
LOCATION (CITY)
SCIENTOLOGY
SCIENTOLOGISTS
AN AUDITOR
AUDITORS
STUDENTS
AN E-METER
METERS
A SESSION
CLEARING
A CLEAR
A RELEASE
A PRECLEAR
A PATIENT
INSANITY
THE MIND
MINDS
MENTAL HEALTH
DIANETICS
BOOK ONE
DIANETIC BOOKSA DIANETIC ORGANIZATION
ORG SURVIVAL
A CENTER
FIELD AUDITORS
HCAs
DSCNs
HGC PCs
ACCs
MENTAL SCIENCE
A SCIENCE OF MIND
MENTAL DOCTORS
SAINT HILL
COURSES
STATEMENTS
UNITS
SCIENTOLOGY PAY
WORLD CLEARING
RON
L. RON HUBBARD
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SCIENTOLOGY BOOKS
A SCIENTOLOGY MAGAZINE
RON’S ARTICLES
A SCIENTOLOGY CONGRESS
A BULLETIN
A POLICY LETTER
A HAT
HATS
A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION
STAFF MEMBERS
A REGISTRAR
SCIENTOLOGY LETTERS
INSTRUCTORS
STAFF AUDITORS
THE D OF P
THE D OF T
HCO
HASI
THE CHURCH
THE FOUNDATION
THE CENTRAL ORG
THE ACADEMY
THE HGC
HDRF
THE CO-AUDIT
CO-AUDITINGTHE GOVERNING DIRECTOR
THE FOUNDER
MARY SUE
MARY SUE HUBBARD
THE ASSOCIATION SECRETARY
THE ORGANIZATION SECRETARY
THE HCO SECRETARY
SECURITY
WITHHOLDS FROM SCIENTOLOGY
OVERTS AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY
YOUR CASE
PEOPLE’S CASES
TECHNIQUES
PROCEDURES
A SQUIRREL
PSYCHOLOGISTS
PSYCHIATRISTS
HUMAN RIGHTS
ENTHETA
RUMORS
BAD AUDITORS
BAD AUDITING
SECURITY RISKS
ROCK SLAMMERS
NO RESULTS
___________________________
A bad person in Scientology___________________________
The worst auditor pc had___________________________
A bad person in Scientology___________________________
A Scientology exec___________________________
A bad person in Scientology___________________________
A Scientology exec___________________________
Auditor’s formal name___________________________
A prominent Scientologist___________________________
Auditor’s informal name___________________________
Something in Scientology
worrying pc___________________________
An auditor pc had___________________________
Something in Scientology
worrying pc___________________________
The first auditor pc had___________________________
Something in Scientology
worrying pc___________________________
The best auditor pc hadNote: Fill in all blanks with pc’s help.
Note: The above when found can be terms or oppterms. It doesn’t matter which. All that matters is meter reaction unless an RI is found on this list. If so identify for Term or Oppterm as in Step 7 and continue R2-12.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Hubbard, L. R. (1962, 24 November). Routine 2-12 List One — The Scientology List (Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin). The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Vol. VI, pp. 679-681). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.