HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 JUNE 1984R1
REVISED 3 MAY 1985Remimeo
False Purpose RD
Auditors
False Purpose RD
C/Ses
Cramming OfficersFalse Purpose Rundown Series 5R
AUDITING THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
Refs:
HCOB 5 June 84R FPRD Series 1R Rev. 11.1.90 FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
Book: Advanced Procedure and Axioms, Chapter “Postulates”
HCOB 28 Nov. 70 C/S Series 22 PSYCHOSIS
HCOB 9 May 77 II ExDn Series 29PSYCHOSIS, MORE ABOUT
HCOB 28 Feb. 84 C/S Series 118 PRETENDED PTS
HCOB 27 Mar. 84 C/S Series 119 STALLED DIANETIC CLEAR: SOLVED
HCOB 7 June 84 FPRD Series 3 THE PRIOR CONFUSION: NEW TECH BREAKTHROUGH
HCOB 8 June 84 FPRD Series 4 CLEARING JUSTIFICATIONS
HCOB 6 Nov. 64 STYLES OF AUDITING (Level II—Guiding Style)
HCOB 21 Mar. 74 END PHENOMENA
HCOB 1 Mar. 77 II CONFESSIONAL FORMSThe False Purpose Rundown is a brand-new development in the handling of overts, withholds, evil purposes and destructive intentions. Using this new technique they are traced straight down to their origins and BLOWN.
EVIL PURPOSES
An evil purpose is a destructive purpose, intention or postulate.
I discovered in 1970 that evil purposes are the basis of insanity. A person who continuously commits harmful acts has evil purposes. He is prompted by these purposes to commit overts. (Such a person often tries to keep these overts carefully hidden while continuing to commit them.)
This does not mean that every pc who gives off an evil purpose is a raving psychotic or a John Dillinger or is bent only on destruction. It does not mean that any pc who discovers he has been dramatizing a destructive intention is an SP.
What it does mean is that this is an area that will cause (or, more likely, has already caused) a great deal of difficulty or conflict not only for the pc himself but for those around him.
POSTULATES
Evil purposes are, in effect, postulates.
Research on purposes and postulates and their role in the general aberration of a case goes back as early as 1950, and a lot of material exists on this in HCOBs and in basic Dianetics and Scientology books.
In dealing with this subject we are, in reality, dealing with a whole spectrum of what are actually postulates: considerations, intentions, purposes, service facsimiles and computations. These are all postulates.
Such false purposes, false considerations, quasi-evil purposes and the like can sit squarely in the road of attempts to hat or train or get case gain on a person.
NEW TECH BREAKTHROUGH
Underlying an overt chain you will very often find an evil purpose or destructive intention. In other words, when you start tracking down O/Ws with E/Ses keeping on a certain type of O/W, you will very likely run into an evil purpose on a case. The underlying evil purpose prompts the person to commit and continue committing harmful acts.
The breakthrough that I have made on this line is in the application of prior confusion tech to the handling of overts and evil purposes. Just as an evil purpose can be found at the bottom of a chain of overts, so can a confusion be found just prior to an evil purpose.
Once the first underlying prior confusion on that chain is located, it is only necessary to have the pc spot the FIRST MOMENT of it to cause it to blow.
AUDITOR REQUIREMENTS
A False Purpose RD Auditor must be a graduate of the new HUBBARD FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN AUDITOR COURSE and provenly competent in handling the high-precision tech of the rundown. A prerequisite to this course is the HUBBARD SENIOR SECURITY CHECKER COURSE, where one becomes a highly skilled Sec Checker. NO ONE who has not successfully completed these two courses may audit the False Purpose Rundown.
The exact requirements to deliver the False Purpose RD are:
1. Student Hat
2. Pro TR Course
3. Class IV Auditor
4. Upper Indoc TR Course (or Upper Indoc TRs previously drilled on any training course)
5. Hubbard Senior Security Checker Course
6. Hubbard False Purpose Rundown Auditor Course (Provisional until interned).
To deliver the False Purpose Rundown to an OT III or New OT IV (which would only be done in an AO or at the FSO) one must have done 1-6 above PLUS:
7. Qualified to audit OT III reviews.
To deliver the False Purpose Rundown to a NOTs pre-OT one must have done all of 1-7 above PLUS:
8. Full training as a Class IX Auditor (Hubbard Advanced Courses Specialist).
FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN FORMS
The False Purpose Rundown procedure utilizes a form that consists of a series of questions related to a specific subject or area. There are different False Purpose RD forms which the C/S may include in the pc’s program. Whatever form is used, the auditor does the whole form on the pc. Every question is cleared and checked on the meter as per basic Sec Checking tech.
Some of the questions on the form ask for overts (e.g., “Have you ever stolen materials from a school?”) and other questions ask directly for evil purposes and destructive intentions (e.g., “Have you had an evil purpose towards a school teacher?”).
Form questions which simply ask for overts are taken E/S to basic, and usually lead right to an evil purpose. (See Steps A to G below.)
On questions which directly ask for evil purposes the auditor takes up the procedure from Step C and carries through to EP.
The whole aim in doing this rundown is to locate overts and evil purposes on the case and fully blow them. These two types of Sec Check questions simply give two different approaches to one thing: getting onto the trail that leads to an evil purpose and, once found, blowing the evil purpose.
AUDITING PROCEDURE
IMPORTANT: Before the rundown is started, the pc must have a clear understanding of what is meant by an evil or destructive intention, and what a confusion and prior confusion are, as per the Technical Dictionary. The commands themselves must also be thoroughly cleared. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS)
STEP A: Auditor clears and asks the question from the False Purpose RD form.
Example: “Do you have an overt on cats?”
On each reading Sec Check question get the question answered fully and the overt pulled with time, place, form and event and pull any justifications of the overt as part of this. This is done with full Sec Checking tech. If no persistent F/N or spectacular release on getting off the overt, go E/S on the overt chain, with each overt question being taken to basic. Just pulling an overt might resuit in a huge release and persistent F/N which would be the EP for that chain.
You may get an F/N accompanied by a cog and VGIs while going down an overt chain. An F/N indicates a release point. What occurs in a case when you get an F/N on going down an overt chain is a key-out; by pursuing it you resume the chain and can pull it down to its underlying evil purpose. It is very important in running down these overt chains that the auditor keeps the pc ON the same chain. Should the pc offer up some other overt or even an evil purpose disrelated to the chain being run, it is just noted in the worksheet for later reference. It would be an auditor error of magnitude to Q-and-A with such an origination and pursue it in the middle of handling the overt chain that was started with. (Ref: HCOB 21 Mar. 62, PREPCHECKING DATA, WHEN TO DO A WHAT)
Note: In running an overt chain E/S, the pc may spot the evil purpose that prompted the overts on that chain. If this occurs, i.e., the pc (without prompting) volunteers the evil purpose or intention that underlies that overt chain, and it is reading on the meter, the auditor goes straight to Step C.
STEP B: If running the overt E/S (to the point where there is apparently no earlier overt) does not result in a spectacular release and persistent F/N, the auditor asks:
“WAS THERE SOME EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION THAT PROMPTED YOU TO COMMIT THAT OVERT?”
and, if this reads, he pulls the evil purpose or destructive intention. The auditor is expected to put in “Suppress” and “Invalidate” if this question is not reading.
(AN “F/N AND VGIs” IS NOT THE EP BEING SOUGHT IN FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN PROCEDURE. THE EP IS A SPECTACULAR RELEASE AND A PERSISTENT F/N. THE PC SHOULD F/N ON THE E/S OVERT CHAIN ITSELF AND THE F/N SHOULD BE INDICATED, BUT THE PROCEDURE IS CONTINUED UNTIL THE FULL EP IS REACHED.)
(If this question [“Was there an evil purpose . . .”] does not read, this puts one back at Step A. The original question one started with [e.g., “Do you have an overt on cats?”] is rechecked as per standard Confessional procedure. Once that original question F/Ns on being checked, carry on with the next question listed on the False Purpose RD form.)
The purpose or intention should read when the pc gives it. If it isn’t reading, do not pursue the item with Steps C1, C2, etc.
STEP C: If there is no great relief and persistent F/N from the pc on finding the evil purpose, get the prior confusion which occurred just before that evil purpose. Then ask for and find the first moment of that prior confusion which led to that evil purpose.
This is done as follows:
C1: The auditor asks: “WAS THERE A CONFUSION THAT OCCURRED JUST BEFORE YOU HAD THE PURPOSE (the wording of the evil purpose given by the pc)?”
(Example: “Was there a confusion that occurred just before you had the purpose ‘to kill cats’?”)
and, by using the meter, the auditor finds this confusion.
C2: The auditor then asks: “WHEN WAS THE FIRST MOMENT OF THAT CONFUSION?” and gets the pc to find this.
STEP D: If there is no spectacular release and persistent F/N on finding the first moment of that prior confusion, ask the pc:
“WAS THERE AN EARLIER TIME YOU HAD THE PURPOSE (the wording of the evil purpose given by the pc)?”
(Example: “Was there an earlier time you had the purpose ‘to kill cats’?”)
and find this earlier time the pc had that purpose. What is being looked for is NOT an earlier-similar purpose, but an earlier time the pc had THAT SAME EXACT PURPOSE.
STEP E: If there is no spectacular release or persistent F/N on finding the earlier time, find the CONFUSION PRIOR TO THAT TIME as per Steps Cl and C2 above, and proceed to Step D.
STEP F: The auditor continues going earlier as per Steps D and E, until the pc has found the first moment of the first confusion which led to THAT evil
purpose.STEP G: If all Steps A through F have been done yet there is still no spectacular release and persistent F/N, assess and handle a False Purpose RD Correction List.
STYLE OF AUDITING
The style of auditing used on the False Purpose RD is Level II, Guiding Style. The auditor must be well drilled in this style of auditing to be successful with the rundown.
GOOD INTENTIONS
ONLY evil or destructive intentions are picked up and handled in this auditing. DO NOT run good intentions.
PAST TRACK
Do not limit the pc to this lifetime when going E/S on overts or when asking for an earlier time he had that evil purpose. These chains very often go whole track.
LISTING
By following the False Purpose RD procedure exactly, the auditor should be able to easily find and pull the pc’s evil purposes. The pc is not asked listing questions, nor is L&N any part of the procedure. But it is possible that a pc could start listing and the auditor must be able to recognize and handle such a situation per standard listing tech.
The auditor would handle an out-list per HCOB 11 Apr. 77, LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF, and HCOB 17 Mar. 74, TWO-WAY COMM, USING WRONG QUESTIONS.
ADDITIONAL NOTE ON SERVICE FACS
Upon reviewing the session worksheets, the C/S may find that a service fac was found and F/Ned, but not fully blown. In such an instance the C/S can order the service fac run in the R3SC brackets in a later session, to fully blow it. It is the auditor’s responsibility to ensure the item reads; if it isn’t reading, it is not run. However, if one is doing a False Purpose RD Correction List and in doing so locates a reading service fac, the auditor should run it out with R3SC in that session.
REPAIR
During a chain if the auditor hits an impasse, it is expected that he would apply the appropriate Sec Checking tools right then and there to handle: Murder Routine, checking for a missed withhold, use of buttons, etc.
If there is some bog that the auditor is unable to rapidly handle using the routine Sec Check debug tools, a False Purpose Rundown Correction List should be assessed and handled.
ENDING THE SESSION
When at some point in doing these steps the pc has a spectacular release and a persistent F/N, end off the session at that point and turn the folder in to the C/S. That would be the EP for that chain and that session.
In the next session the auditor rechecks the last question run on the False Purpose RD form, and if reading, repeats Steps A to G on it. When that question no longer reads on checking, one proceeds on to the next question on the form.
SUMMARY
The importance of using this tech of purposes and considerations is immeasurable.
It can make the difference between complete failure and successful hatting; between a hell-bound existence and a pleasurable productive life.
This tech is for use. Use it well.
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Hubbard, L. R. (1984, 9 June). Auditing The False Purpose Rundown. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. (1991 ed., Vol. XII, p. 574-81.). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.
Notes
- Document studied on the Hubbard False Purpose Rundown Auditor Course. ↩